Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ginni Thomas has ‘serious concerns’ about testifying to Jan 6 committee, her lawyer says

The attorney for the Supreme Court Justice’s wife says that the committee needs better justification.

Eric Garcia
Wednesday 29 June 2022 16:38 BST
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The lawyer for Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, said the conservative activist has “serious concerns” about testifying before the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 riot at the US Capitol.

Mark Paoletta sent an eight-page letter, obtained by The Daily Caller, to the committee as it has sought her testimony. Mr Paoletta specifically cited how Supreme Court Justices have been subjected to threats after a draft opinion of the court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade.

“I would also note that this has been a particularly stressful time as the Thomases have been subjected to an avalanche of death threats and other abuse by the unprecedented assault on the conservative Supreme Court Justices and their families”, the letter said.

Ms Thomas’s actions have come under the purview of the Select Committee amid multiple news stories about her efforts to undermine the 2020 presidential election results.

The Washington Post and CBS News reported how she sent multiple text messages to then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows about overturning the election results and had mass-emailed 29 Arizona legislators to overturn former president Donald Trump’s loss in the state. But Mr Paoletta said the texts were “extremely unremarkable.”

“She was simply texting with a friend”, he wrote.

The Post also reported that she communicated with Trump attorney John Eastman, a former clerk for her husband who hatched the plan for former vice president Mike Pence to block the certification of the presidential election results.

Unlike many spouses of Supreme Court Justices, Ms Thomas is a prominent conservative activist who has been active in right-wing circles in Washington for decades.

Ms Thomas previously said she was “looking forward” to testifying.

“I can’t wait to clear up misconceptions. I look forward to talking to them”, she told Shelby Talcott, a reporter for conservative news outlet The Daily Caller.

Mr Paoletta said that the committee needed better justificiation of its aims before his client testified.

“As she has already indicated, Mrs. Thomas is eager to clear her name and is willing to appear before the Committee to do so”,” he wrote. “However, based on my understanding of the communications that spurred the Committee’s request, I do not understand the need to speak with Mrs. Thomas.”

Mr Paoletta noted how the committee sought Ms Thomas’s testimony because she invited Mr Eastman to speak to a group of activists, but said the invite was not as significant as it appeared.

“An invitation from Mrs. Thomas is an invitation to speak, and nothing more”, he said. “It is not an endorsement of the speaker’s views, nor is it any indication of a working relationship between the speaker and Mrs. Thomas. In fact, Mrs. Thomas often does not share the views of those invited leaders or activists.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in