Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Georgia says charge decision is imminent in Trump election interference as grand jury report kept secret

Ms Willis says ‘decisions are imminent’ about seeking criminal charges against figures involved in Mr Trump’s push to overturn the 2020 election

Andrew Feinberg
Tuesday 24 January 2023 20:25 GMT
Comments
Judge to hold hearing over Georgia special grand jury report on Trump

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Fulton County, Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis has asked that a special grand jury report on efforts by Donald Trump and his allies to reverse his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden be kept under seal because she is still considering whether to ask for criminal charges against people involved in the schemes.

Speaking before Judge Robert McBurney at a Tuesday hearing to determine whether the report will be released at the request of a group of news organisations, Ms Willis told the judge that making it public at this time could prejudice future cases against potential defendants.

“We think for future defendants to be treated fairly it’s not appropriate at this time for the report to be released," she said. She added that "decisions are imminent" regarding whether she will seek indictments from a regular grand jury against people involved in Mr Trump’s push to reverse his loss to Mr Biden.

In further arguments before Judge McBurney, Fulton County Assistant District Attorney Donald Wakeford said Ms Willis’ office is “not opposed” to an “eventual release” of the report.

“Now is not the time, but eventually, we will have a better idea of when the time will be and ... the district attorney's office is not opposed to the eventual release,” he said. “It’s opposed to it right now, and it’s opposed to releasing it without very careful consideration in light of all the other factors that are in play”.

Attorneys representing the coalition of media organisations that are seeking the immediate release of the report repeatedly pointed to case law which they say supports making the grand jury’s report public. They argued that the law which protects grand jury deliberations does not require the report to remain secret because it is more akin to an indictment than the grand jury’s internal work product.

“We believe the report should be released now and in its entirety. And that approach is consistent with the way the American judicial system operates,” said Tom Clyde, a lawyer for the media coalition.

“In other words, it is not unusual for a district attorney or a prosecuting authority to be generally uncomfortable with having to release information during the progress of the case. That occurs all the time,” he added.

Judge McBurney said he would not issue a “rash decision” and promised the parties that he would not surprise them by suddenly ordering the report’s release without giving both sides notice and time to file an appeal.

“No one’s going to wake up with the court having disclosed the report on the front page of a newspaper,” he said.

The Fulton County judge added that it was “somewhat extraordinary” for the arguments to have taken place to begin with, citing the subject matter under investigation by the grand jury, “alleged interference with the presidential election”.

The special grand jury, which wrapped up its work last month, was charged with investigating Mr Trump’s efforts to reverse his 2020 election defeat to Mr Biden, including his calls to Peach State election officials and a plot to submit forged electoral college documents to the National Archives to give then-vice president Mike Pence a reason to hijack the 6 January 2021 joint session of Congress by declaring him and Mr Trump the winners of the election.

The 23-member grand jury recommended that the report be made public, but because Georgia law doesn’t allow special grand juries to issue criminal indictments, Ms Willis must return to a regular grand jury if she decides to seek charges against Mr Trump or any of his associates.

Ms Willis, who began the investigation nearly two years ago, has said she will go where the facts lead. It would be an extraordinary step if she chooses to bring charges against Trump himself, as no American president has ever faced criminal charges in any court of law.

As for who could face charges as a result of her investigation, the probe sought testimony from and about numerous allies of the twice-impeached ex-president, including former New York mayor and Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, US Sen Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and former national security adviser Michael Flynn, as well as John Eastman and other lawyers who participated in Trump's attempts to stay in power.

With additional reporting by agencies

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in