For media following Georgia, nail-biting and lots of numbers
It was a tense night for news organizations that gave Tuesday's vote count for the Georgia Senate runoffs the type of intense attention that the presidential election received
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.For news organizations chronicling the vote count in the Georgia Senate runoff elections, Tuesday felt like a rerun from two months ago: nerves on edge, an avalanche of numbers and a lot of Steve Kornacki.
The two Senate elections, with the U.S. Senate's balance of power at stake, attracted media attention that recalled the days after the presidential election, including breathless wall-to-wall coverage on cable news networks.
“It's beyond nail-biting time,” CNN's John King said shortly past 10 p.m. on the East Coast.
King and MSNBC s Kornacki dominated their networks with headache-inducing number crunching. Kornacki was MSNBC's breakout star in the aftermath of the general election and he returned Tuesday with his familiar khakis and a “Kornacki cam” that followed his moves during commercial breaks.
“Usual rules apply,” MSNBC's Brian Williams said to him. “Wave your arms if there's any reason to come back to you.”
Democratic candidates Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff jumped to early leads against Republican incumbents Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue. As more votes came in, the Republicans swung in front.
It made for some great television suspense, although people following online saw a different view. The New York Times website estimated the victory probabilities in each race and, as the evening progressed, moved steadily in the Democrats' direction. By 10 p.m., the Times was estimating Warnock had an 89% chance of victory and Ossoff had a 75% chance.
Even before that, Dave Wasserman of the influential Cook Political Report tweeted that he had seen enough to predict Warnock would beat Loeffler.
Fox News spent less time on raw numbers to showcase their prime-time stars, Tucker Carlson Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham. They didn't hide their nervousness.
“This is giving everyone a big stomachache from both parties,” Ingraham said.
There was a sharpness to the television voices that reflected the tense presidential election and its aftermath. CNN's Jake Tapper said the expected back-and-forth vote tallies were perfectly normal, and showed how “morally bankrupt” Trump followers were in complaining about changing tallies in November.
“What you're seeing is epic political malpractice by Donald Trump,” said David Plouffe, former aide to President Barack Obama, on MSNBC. “He may have cost his party the U.S. Senate — he and his confederacy of dunces.”
On Fox, Carlson described Ossoff as “lighter than air. He makes Beto O'Rourke look like Teddy Roosevelt.”
His colleague Hannity said Loeffler and Perdue “are standing in the way of a radical left agenda that would actively work to strip away pretty much all of President Trump's achievements.”
Eventually, the coverage turned into a waiting game for lagging numbers from the Democratic stronghold of DeKalb County.