Feds say Texas voter ID laws purposely discriminated against black and Hispanic voters
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In July, an appeals court ruled that Texas lawmakers discriminated against African-American and Hispanic voters by passing strict voter identification laws, and now, The Obama administration and activists are calling on a judge to rule that the lawmakers did this intentionally.
Justice Department lawyers are arguing, in a 45-page briefing sent to the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, that Senate Bill 14 was created to intentionally disenfranchise voters. On the defense, Ken Paxton, the state’s attorney general, argued that the federal officials are creating a false narrative. Others claimed that the bill prevented voter fraud, which is rarely proven to be an issue in the state.
Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos of Corpus Christi is now tasked with deciding if Texas violated the US Constitution by intentionally discriminating against minority groups. On Friday, lawyers with the Justice Department claimed a wealth of evidence lead to their conclusion, pointing to the state’s history of elections and voter trends that could unseat folks currently in office.
In his filing, Mr Paxton claims that the Justice Department doesn’t have the evidence they need to prove the state violated the Constitution. “Despite their unlimited access to the confidential communications of Texas legislators who supported SB 14,” his team wrote, “plaintiffs could proffer no evidence that any legislator harbored even a private intention to disenfranchise minority voters.”