Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mark Zuckerberg ‘pretty confident’ Facebook can protect integrity of 2020 election

CEO also explained how company handles coronavirus misinformation – including false claims of cures spread by presidents

Andrew Naughtie
Thursday 21 May 2020 10:27 BST
Comments
Mark Zuckerberg ‘pretty confident’ Facebook can protect integrity of 2020 election

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has said his platform is ready to combat misinformation during the oncoming US presidential election, as it fights an “arms race” battle against electoral meddling by foreign states.

In his first broadcast interview in five years, Mr Zuckerberg told the BBC that he and his company “have learnt a lot about how politics works online” since 2016, and that Facebook has been working with governments around the world to get ready for the upcoming onslaught of meddling between now and November.

“One big area that we were behind on in 2016 but I think now are quite advanced at is identifying and fighting these co-ordinated information campaigns that come from different state actors around the world.”

Saying the company has worked with governments around the world to get better at identifying these threats, Mr Zuckerberg stated that “countries are going to continue to try and interfere, and we are going to see issues like that.

“And I feel pretty confident that we are going to be able to protect the integrity of the upcoming election.”

Facebook is under heavy pressure from US authorities to take more responsibility for the political content it hosts. According to a Princeton University study, no other internet platform facilitated the spread misinformation as quickly and in such volume.

Nonetheless, it has resisted calls for sweeping changes, and in for criticism at the start of this year when it announced it would not make changes to its advertising policies, including the micro-targeting that allows political actors to send crafted messages to extremely specific groups.

Mr Zuckerberg, who exerts total individual control at the company, was also asked about the spread of misinformation around the coronavirus pandemic, including unfounded claims that 5G infrastructure is playing a part in the virus’s spread.

“If some crazy person decided to start telling people to drink or inject bleach” – alluding Donald Trump effectively did recently – “what is the Facebook algorithm’s response to that?”

Mr Zuckerberg replied that when it comes to “harmful misinformation that puts people at imminent risk of physical harm”, Facebook will take it down – but that even where someone isn’t at immediate risk of physical harm, “we don’t want misinformation to be the content that is broadly going viral across the network”.

That, apparently, applies to all users and public speakers, no matter how powerful. “There was a case where the Brazilian president said that it was proven by all scientists that there’s a drug that was proven to cure coronavirus. That’s obviously not true … so we had to enforce that.”

Still, the Facebook CEO said that there are two tiers of misinformation. “If you’re saying something that’s going to put people at imminent risk of harm, we take it down. If you’re saying something that is just wrong, we don’t take that down, but we stop it from spreading, generally. That’s a much more sensitive topic, because there are a lot of things in society that someone thinks is bad, but other people on the other side of that issue think it’s good.

“I think unless something is very clear that it’s going to cause real damage to someone in the near-term, I think you generally want to allow as wide an aperture of expression as possible.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in