E Jean Carroll’s defamation suit against Donald Trump moving forward
The White House previously sought to delay the suit and use the Department of Justice to fight it
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A lawsuit is moving forward accusing the president of defamation for saying writer E Jean Carroll was lying after she accused him of rape, ABC News reports, with the start of the discovery process potentially beginning this year, despite various White House attempts to halt it.
“We look forward to finally moving ahead with discovery in the case, which has been on hold since Trump filed his motion for a stay last February,” Ms Carroll’s attorney Roberta Kaplan said in a statement. Lawyers representing the president did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A conference is scheduled to discuss the suit in early December, a sign it could be moving forward.
The Department of Justice, acting on a request from the White House, took the rare step of trying to intervene and defend the president as a government employee rather than an individual in the civil lawsuit, arguing the allegations questioned his fitness for office and thus related to his official duties in office.
In October, a federal judge in New York denied that request, writing, “His comments concerned an alleged sexual assault that took place several decades before he took office, and the allegations have no relationship to the official business of the United States.”
The president had also tried to delay the suit until he left office, arguing sitting presidents were completely immune to civil lawsuits in state court, but that move was rejected in August, and rendered moot now that he has lost the presidential election.
In 2019, Ms Carroll accused the president in a book excerpt in New York magazine of raping her in the dressing room of a New York department store in 1990s. She’s one of at least 26 women who have accused Donald Trump of sexual assault, all of which he denies.
If the case does indeed move forward to the evidence-gathering stage, Ms Carroll says she kept the dress she was wearing the day of the alleged incident, which she says contains the president’s genetic material.
The defamation suit is one of a number of investigations and lawsuits the president will face without the added layer of protection the White House can provide, including probes into his finances and potential fraud.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments