Donald Trump’s libel lawsuit against CNN is dismissed by federal judge
The president’s team alleged the network maliciously published an op-ed piece on 13 June, 2019
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump’s libel lawsuit against CNN was dismissed by a federal judge on Thursday, ending the president’s legal battle over an op-ed published in 2019.
The president’s team alleged the network maliciously published an op-ed piece on 13 June, 2019, by Larry Noble that claimed “the Trump campaign assessed the potential risks and benefits of again seeking Russia’s help in 2020 and has decided to leave that option on the table.”
The opinion piece was written in the aftermath of Robert Mueller’s investigation into the Trump campaign’s connections with Russia.
Following the publication of the article, the Trump team filed a lawsuit in March as one of its different litigation routes against multiple media companies.
In the lawsuit, which was filed in Georgia where CNN is headquartered, Mr Trump’s lawyers said that the news organisation published the op-ed with the knowledge the information in it was false. The decision to publish the piece, the lawyers said, was an act of gross negligence and libel against the sitting president.
The Trump campaign sought “millions of dollars” through litigation.
US District Judge Michael L Brown, who was appointed by the president, disagreed and ruled the Trump team has yet to provide proof CNN intended actual malice against the president in publishing the article.
“The Court grants Defendants’ motion and dismisses Plaintiff’s complaint for failing sufficiently to plead malice. The Court, however, allows Plaintiff the opportunity to file an amended complaint,” Judge Brown wrote.
The judge rejected CNN’s claim, though, that Mr Nobel’s piece was not actionable to libel because it was a statement of opinion versus a fact.
“His opinion lies on both sides with the Statement as a factual allegation bringing them together,” he wrote. “The context of the Statement (both in the article and in Mr. Noble’s discussion of current events) suggest to readers that the Statement is a statement of fact, not opinion.”
Now Mr Trump’s lawyers have until the end of the month to file an amended complaint if they want to proceed with the lawsuit.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments