Attorneys General seek documents regarding Trump hotel in case accusing president of violating constitution
The president is accused of benefiting from foreign dignitaries staying at his hotel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Two attorneys general have asked Donald Trump for any of his correspondence with government officials regarding his hotel in Washington DC.
The district’s Attorney General Karl Racine and Maryland’s Brian Frosh made the request to the US District Court in Maryland.
It was part of a civil suit against the president, alleging he violated the emoluments clause of the US Constitution and is benefiting from foreign governments without Congress’ permission.
The Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution bars federal officials from accepting gifts or rewards from foreign government officials; the Domestic Emoluments Clause says the president cannot accept benefits from state governments.
The hotel is just a stone’s throw from the White House and several visiting dignitaries and state officials appear to have stayed at the hotel as paying guests.
Mr Trump’s legal team has attempted to stop the case, but the judge, Peter Messitte, ruled in July 2018 that it can go forward.
This is the first case involving the emoluments clauses to ever go to trial.
Since Mr Trump placed his assets in a blind trust before he took office, the attorneys general have asked for other documents as well.
They have requested, as part of the “document discovery” phase of the case, the hotel’s business records with foreign government officials and records of money flowing from the hotel to the trust, and records from the General Services Administration of the federal government which leases the hotel to the Trump Organisation.
The attorneys general have also asked for records from the US Treasury Department which handles the lease payments for the hotel.
The case has run into some roadblocks as the Department of Justice, defending the president has asked the case be stalled until a critical question has been decided by Mr Messitte - whether to include Mr Trump as an individual in the case not just in his official capacity.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments