GOP strategist refuses to give straight answer about Trump’s ‘racist’ comments about migrants in testy CNN segment
There is no evidence that Haitian migrants are eating pets, as Donald Trump and JD Vance have claimed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A conservative political analyst sparked a heated conversation on CNN after refusing to give a straight answer about Donald Trump’s debunked conspiracy theory targeting Haitian migrants.
The exchange happened during a CNN panel on Wednesday, during which participants discussed the debunked right-wing claim that Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio are eating pet cats and dogs. The unfounded claim, which Trump and his running mate JD Vance have amplified, appears to have originated from a post describing a fourth-hand account on a Springfield Facebook group.
There is no evidence to support the theory and city officials have rejected the claim.
Things became heated when political commentator Ana Navarro asked Scott Jennings, a conservative political analyst, his thoughts on the theory.
“He was amplifying a conspiracy theory that I think you would agree puts a target on the backs of Haitian immigrants and that it is based on racism,” Navarro told Jennings during the Wednesday night panel. “Would you agree on that?”
“Anti-Black racism, to be more pointed,” panelist Nina Turner added.
Jennings went silent and Navarro continued: “Do you think that if there were 20,000 Scandinavians that had been sent to Springfield that your people would be saying that they’re eating cats and dogs and geese?”
“I’m not going to answer for him, for his memes, for anything else,” Jennings responded.
“I’m asking you,” Navarro clarified, “do you think that is based in racism?”
“I’m not going to answer, I don’t know,” Jennings said.
“That was a long pause, Scott,” host Abby Phillip responded, referring to his earlier silence.
“Because I don’t know the answer,” he continued. “I’m not going to sit here and answer for somebody. I don’t talk to Donald Trump about what the motivations are.”
The Independent has contacted Jennings for comment.
The baseless conspiracy theory has been a key topic in the political sphere this week. Trump even tried to promote the claim during his debate with Vice President Kamala Harris on Tuesday but was quickly fact-checked by the moderators.
“ABC News did reach out to the city manager there,” moderator David Muir said. “He told us there had been no credible reports of specific claims of pets being harmed, injured or abused by individuals within the immigrant community.”
“Well, I’ve seen people on television. People on television say, ‘My dog was taken and used for food,’ so maybe he said that and maybe that’s a good thing to say for a city manager,” Trump responded, continuing to peddle the false claim.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments