Critics slam Chris Christie for mentioning disputed 'Ferguson effect' during debate
Some say the rhetoric is a distraction from concerns of civil rights activists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A leading civil rights lawyer has condemned remarks by Chris Christie, in which the New Jersey Governor blamed President Obama for “failing to support police officers.”
During Wednesday’s night Republican debate, Mr Christie referred to comments made earlier in the week by FBI Director James Comey. who claimed extra scrutiny on police in the year since the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, had exacerbated crime.
Some have called this idea the “Ferguson effect,” and it has drawn derision from civil rights activists, law enforcement officials and, on Monday, the White House.
“The evidence that we’ve seen so far doesn’t support the contention that law enforcement officials are somehow shirking their responsibility,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest said on Monday at a news briefing in Washington.
Jonathan Smith, Associate Dean of Experiential and Clinical Programmes at the UDC David A Clarke School of Law and former head of the Special Litigation Section of the Department of Justice — which produced the Ferguson Report — told The Independent that Mr Christie’s comments were “very disturbing.”
“There’s no evidence that the police are withdrawing their services,” he said.
While there has been a rise in murders, it was not uniform across the US and “there’s nothing that links that rise to the attention that’s been paid to police misconduct in the last several years," Mr Smith continued.
Mr Smith said: “The real problem is that there’s a breakdown in the trust between police and the communities that they serve, and that trust is essential is to producing public safety.”
He added: “The other thing that’s very troubling about what Christie said in particular is [that it] points a finger at the president, and by implication, Attorney General Holder. This administration has been enormously supportive of police from the very beginning.”
Attorney General Eric Holder, who took office in 2009, has invested heavily in protecting officer safety.
He presented the Preventing Violence Against Law Enforcement and Ensuring Officer Resilience and Survivability [VALOR] initiative in 2010.
The initiative was created by the Department of Justice to specifically to reduce and prevent law enforcement officer line of duty injuries and deaths by training officers in techniques for approaching violence encounters.
Mr Smith added that: "the idea that police officers are choosing not to fulfill their duty really dishonours the majority of police officers who get up every morning and go to work and put on that badge and put on that uniform to do the right thing.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments