CNN legal analyst claims Cohen ‘stealing’ is ‘more serious’ than Trump’s charges
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A legal analyst for CNN claims Michael Cohen’s admission that he stole money from the Trump Organization is actually “more serious” than the falsified business records charges the former president faces.
During cross-examination on Monday, Cohen admitted that he “stole” from the Trump Organization by upcharging them tens of thousands of dollars as part of the hush-money reimbursement plan he agreed to with Donald Trump.
During CNN’s coverage, legal analyst Elie Honig said that the practice, which is considered larceny in New York state, was “crushing” the prosecution’s credibility.
“The fact that he was never charged with larceny is important because stealing $60,000 through fraud, which would be larceny in New York state, is more serious of a crime than falsifying business records,” Mr Honig said.
Cohen, Mr Trump’s former lawyer and one-time fixer, said during cross-examination that he has never pleaded guilty to larceny or paid back the Trump Organization. The prosecution did not ask Cohen about this while he testified last week.
But during re-direct, Cohen explained that he overcharged the Trump Organization for work he did with Red Finch, a technology firm, to juice-up Mr Trump’s numbers on a poll about the most influential businessmen.
After coming in ninth, Mr Trump felt it wasn’t worth the amount of money Cohen promised to pay Red Finch. Ultimately, Cohen paid the company $20,000 cash in a brown paper bag.
But he still asked the Trump Organization for $50,000 in reimbursement. Cohen said it was “almost like self-help”.
“I wasn’t going to correct the conversation I was having with Allen [Weisselberg] about it. I had not only protected [Mr Trump] to the best that I could but I had also laid out money to Red Finch a year and a half earlier, and again, $130,000 to have my bonus cut by two-thirds was very upsetting to say the least,” Cohen testified.
Mr Honig told CNN on Monday that Cohen dropped a “bomb” on the prosecution with the revelation that he’d pocketed money from the Trump Organization.
“Michael Cohen was stealing from Donald Trump, he was lying to people about what he was doing with the money,” Mr Honig said.
Already, Mr Trump’s defense attorneys have sought to paint Cohen as an unreliable witness who has lied under oath multiple times.
Cohen is the prosecution’s main witness in the case in which Mr Trump is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records.
The former lawyer is the one who helped Mr Trump strike a deal with adult film star Stormy Daniels to buy her silence about allegations of an affair between the two. Mr Trump denies the affair happened and has pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Cohen previously testified that he paid Ms Daniels $130,000 just days before the 2016 presidential election and Mr Trump reimbursed him for those payments through monthly installments in 2017.
Those monthly payments amounted to $420,000, including $130,000 for paying Ms Daniels and $50,000 for paying Red Finch. They added $60,000 for Cohen’s year-end bonus and then doubled the total for “tax purposes.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments