Biden demands constitutional amendment on presidential immunity in final warning before Trump takes power
Trump’s administration is expected to be full of lawyers who fought to expand the scope of presidential power
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In his final address to the nation as president, Joe Biden called for the creation of a new Constitutional amendment to demolish the concept of presidential “immunity” from criminal prosecution.
“We need to amend the Constitution to make clear that no president, no president, is immune from crimes he or she commits while in office,” he said in remarks from the Oval Office on Wednesday.
“The president’s power is not unlimited,” he said. “It’s not absolute. And it shouldn’t be.”
Last summer, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority granted sitting presidents absolute “immunity” from criminal prosecution for actions stemming from “official” duties, and “presumptive” immunity for actions in the “outer perimeter” of the functions of the presidency.
That ruling marked a seismic victory for Donald Trump, who argued that his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election are “immune” from prosecution in the sprawling federal criminal case against him.
The Supreme Court’s decision scrambled efforts from special counsel Jack Smith to prosecute the case against the former president, whose appeals on his “immunity” defense triggered a series of delays that ensured he would evade a trial before November’s election.
After his victory, Smith ended the case altogether, along with a separate case involving Trump’s handling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.
Trump has repeatedly invoked “immunity” to try to dissolve cases against him in courts across the country. He urged the judge overseeing his so-called hush money trial to reject evidence he claims should be shielded by “immunity,” and then argued that the Supreme Court’s “immunity” ruling demanded that a jury’s 34-count guilty verdict be thrown out.
After his election victory, Trump’s attorneys claimed his “immunity” extended to his status as a president-elect, signalling how far he could test the limits of presidential power as he returns to the White House.
Trump’s Department of Justice and White House legal counsel is expected to be made up of criminal defense attorneys who advanced the “immunity” theory and argued to expand the scope of presidential power in front of the Supreme Court.
Biden similarly warned the nation about the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in remarks that followed the ruling on July 1, saying that the ruling “almost certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do.”
“It’s a dangerous precedent because the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law, even including the Supreme Court of the United States,” he said at the time. “The only limits will be self-imposed by the president alone.”
Trump “will be free to ignore the law,” Biden said last year.
Biden’s farewell address largely warned against the new administration ushering in a new age of “robber barons” and an “oligarchy” that “literally threatens our entire democracy” with an unprecedented concentration of wealth and power.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments