Proposed Arizona bill requires anyone filming police to stand 15ft away
Former police officer John Kavanagh said he had introduced bill to stop citizen video makers from interfering with police work
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Arizona's state legislature is considering a law that would ban citizens from filming police officers from closer than 15ft.
Republican representative John Kavanagh, a former cop, introduced the bill after being approached by officers who said that people filming them were coming too close and interfering with their work.
The bill would affect anyone filming a police officer engaged in “law enforcement activity” without the officer’s permission. A previous version of the bill in 2016 had a 20ft limit.
But civil rights lawyers said the law would probably be struck down in court for violating the American constitution, and in the meantime would chill public oversight of the police.
“My bill is quite reasonable,” Mr Kavanagh told Fox 10 Phoenix. “You can film all you want from 15 feet. It’s only when you want to get closer, where you will begin to be a potential threat or a distraction to the officer, that you have to stay away.”
He claimed that the limit would actually help citizens capture evidence against police misconduct, since they would have a broader perspective and be able to see the context around the incident.
“The civilian video on the George Floyd incident was taken from about 15 to 20 feet away, and because of that, it captured everybody at the scene and was more useful from an informative and an evidentiary [perspective],” he said.
However, Dan Barr, a lawyer specialising in First Amendment cases, said the bill would have banned a second video of George Floyd that was taken from a closer distance and was crucial to the conviction of Floyd’s killer Derek Chauvin.
The American Civil Liberties Union has opposed the bill, arguing that it would simply lead authorities to waste tax dollars trying and failing to defend its constitutionality in court.
Mr Kavanagh’s bill includes a narrow exception for incidents that happen indoors and on private property, where the person filming it has permission to be on the property.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments