Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says Biden infrastructure plan falls short of $10 trillion for jobs, health and climate
‘I have serious concerns that it’s not enough’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says the president's $2.25 trillion infrastructure announcement was "not nearly enough" and is well below the $10 trillion needed to create jobs for union workers, while also solving health care, housing and carbon emissions.
The New York congresswoman appeared on MSNBC's Rachel Maddow to express "serious concerns" that Joe Biden was underspending on the future of America by $7.75 trillion to realize his "inspiring vision"
"We're talking about, realistically, $10 trillion over 10 years. And I know that may be an eye-popping figure for some people, but we need to understand that we are in a devastating economic moment," Ms Ocasio-Cortez said.
"Millions of people in the United States are unemployed. We have a truly crippled health care system and a planetary crisis on our hands, and we’re the wealthiest nation in the history of the world. So we can do $10 trillion."
The push for more government spending from the progressive wing of the Democratic party represents a fissure from moderates that are wielding an increasing amount of influence in the split Senate and narrow House majority.
Read more:
- Biden news - live: Trump finance chief subpoenaed
- Damning report criticises Ivanka Trump’s flagship policy programme
- EPA to remove 40 Trump-appointed experts to restore ‘scientific integrity’
- Marjorie Taylor Greene says Biden’s vaccine passport plan should be called ‘the Mark of the Beast’
- Tucker Carlson says Matt Gaetz interview was ‘one of the weirdest’ he has done
Democrats can afford to lose just three votes in the House and several moderate members are "sceptical" about the tax-and-spend plan Biden proposes to pay for his infrastructure spending, according to Axios.
Leader of the House Democrats' moderate faction, New Jersey's Josh Gottheimer, told said he worries tax increases could slow economic recovery.
"We need to be careful not to do anything that's too big or too much in the middle of a pandemic and an economic crisis," he told the outlet.
"It's got to be responsible and both parties need to be at the table. This can't just be jammed through without input and consideration from the other side."
In the Senate, where just one defection would derail the plan, Joe Manchin of West Virginia has suggested he wouldn't back certain tax hikes.
Ms Ocasio-Cortez, however, maintains that the bill should "absolutely" be increased before going to the Senate.
"That $2.2 trillion over eight years, I have serious concerns that it's not enough to realize the very inspiring vision that Biden has advanced," she said.
"We are in a devastating economic moment, millions of people in the United States are unemployed, we have a truly crippled health care system, and a planetary crisis on our hands, and we're the wealthiest nation in the history of the world. So we can do 10 trillion, that is a thing of political imagination," she added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments