Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Twitter users boast about voting for dead gorilla Harambe on Twitter and post the proof

In response, many expressed fury at seeing votes 'wasted' on the animal

Lucy Pasha-Robinson
Wednesday 09 November 2016 14:07 GMT
Comments
Harambe was a 17-year-old silverback western lowland gorilla
Harambe was a 17-year-old silverback western lowland gorilla (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Americans who claim to have voted for the late gorilla Harambe to become the 45th President of the United States are posting photos of their ballots on social media.

In the wake of Donald Trump’s shock White House victory, photos flooded Twitter showing voters who had used the write-in section of their ballots to vote for the gorilla.

Some said Harambe’s name appeared on as many as 11,000 votes, a claim that has yet to be substantiated.

Protests across America after Trump victory

The gorilla’s death sparked outrage in May after he was shot when a toddler fell into his enclosure at Cincinnati Zoo.

However, many users expressed their fury at seeing votes “wasted” on a dead animal.

Posting a picture of a completed ballot to social media is a contentious issue in the US. Eric Trump came under fire for tweeting a photo of his completed ballot, which constitutes a violation of New York State law.

US voting regulations are set at a state level or lower, so laws in this area vary, although most states carry criminal penalties for those who post photographs of their ballots.

Despite some states allowing write-in candidates, these votes are believed to make little impact on the final result.

Eight states did not allow space for write-ins in 2016's elections while in 32 others, write-in candidates had to file with the state prior to the election to be counted as official candidates.

At the time of writing, the popular vote was still being counted with Hillary Clinton holding 58,874,061 votes to Donald Trump’s 58,839,749.

However, the US electoral college system means a candidate can win the popular vote while ultimately losing out on the presidency.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in