Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US officials split on whether to release images of abuse

Rupert Cornwell
Friday 14 May 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Top American officials and politicians are sharply divided over whether to release the hundreds of hitherto unpublished pictures and video clips from Abu Ghraib prison, showing even more shocking abuse of Iraqi detainees, as well as X-rated sexual antics by some of the soldiers who guarded them.

Top American officials and politicians are sharply divided over whether to release the hundreds of hitherto unpublished pictures and video clips from Abu Ghraib prison, showing even more shocking abuse of Iraqi detainees, as well as X-rated sexual antics by some of the soldiers who guarded them.

The images were shown by the Pentagon on Wednesday afternoon in two secure rooms on Capitol Hill - one on the Senate Side, the other on the House side of the building. They left most members of Congress who inspected them appalled - and in broad agreement that they could prove even more damaging than those that have already shaken the Bush administration to its foundation.

Some of the pictures depict further indignities apparently enforced on Iraqi prisoners, including women being made to bare their breasts for the camera, male prisoners forced to masturbate in front of their guards, a prisoner apparently about to be sodomised with a broomstick, and another man apparently repeatedly banging his head hard against a wall - either at the orders of his captors, or to spare himself some unspeakable new humiliation.

"There were some awful scenes," Richard Durbin, a Democratic Senator from Illinois, said. "It felt like you were descending into the rings of hell, and it was of our own creation."

The brutality seems to have been mingled with unbridled sexual behaviour by the US soldiers. According to several accounts, Private Lynndie England - already notorious as the female soldier holding a leash attached to the neck of a naked prisoner - was shown having apparently consensual sex with several partners and, US officials told NBC's Nightly News, in the presence of Iraqi detainees.

The images were shown just a few hours after Pte England, 21, appeared in a television interview in which she claimed to have been told to pose for the photos, which she said she found "rather weird". So far, seven members of the 372nd Military Police Company, which Pte England belonged to, have been charged with abuse offences. The first court-martial will begin in Baghdad on May 19, while two other soldiers - Sgts Ivan Frederick and Javal Davis - will face military trials on a date to be specified. Six more senior officers have been reprimanded. This procedure could see them thrown out of the armed forces.

Partly to protect the integrity of the trials, the Pentagon insists the pictures seen on Capitol Hill must remain secret, and many senior politicians seem to agree, adding that publication couldworsen the situation in the Middle East.

Pentagon officials admit some or all of the images could be circulating on CDs or cameras and could go public anytime. Now that the pictures have been seen by members of Congress some in the Bush administration believe their impact will be less when they do, inevitably, enter the public domain.

Several Senators and Representatives said after viewing the new pictures that they seemed to confirm that more soldiers than the seven charged were present. This implies that the abuse was not confined to a rogue unit, but was actively encouraged by the intelligence officers de facto in charge at Abu Ghraib.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in