Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US hints it may be ready to compromise on Iraq resolution

David Usborne
Saturday 05 October 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The United States continued to push the United Nations to impose the toughest possible rules on weapons inspections in Iraq while giving the first indication that it may none the less be willing to compromise on the format of a Security Council resolution.

The White House said that President George Bush, who has been waging parallel campaigns for strongly worded resolutions from both the Security Council and the US Congress, planned to make an important speech on Iraq on Monday evening.

Hans Blix, the UN weapons inspector, was in Washington yesterday for talks with the Secretary of State, Colin Powell, and Mr Bush's chief foreign policy adviser, Condoleezza Rice. Mr Blix indicated on Thursday that he would postpone resuming inspections until the Security Council had agreed a resolution. The Pentagon said it believed Iraq had anticipated the resumption of the arms inspections and was concealing all evidence of illegal weapons.

There were the first signs yesterday that the US might be willing to back off from a draft text circulated in the UN earlier this week that drew a sharply hostile reaction from Paris, Moscow and Beijing. It included a blunt threat of military force in the event that Iraq made any attempt to impede the inspections once they begin. With prodding from Britain, the US is now considering an approach proposed by the French President, Jacques Chirac. He sees a first resolution clarifying new rules for the conduct of the inspections. The warning of military punishment would come in a second resolution that would only be adopted if Iraq fell foul of the new UN demands.

One US administration official told Reuters news agency: "We've not decided specifically [on two resolutions]. We still want one resolution but we're exploring with the British and the French ways of bridging the difference between the resolution that we want and the two the French want."

While Britain has stood by the US in demanding a single text with a clear threat of military reprisals, the Government has discreetly been pressing on Washington the need to consider at least a variation on the French formula. London fears that the US text as it now stands would be vetoed by France and Russia.

The wrangling over the Security Council resolution is holding up the timetable for inspections. Mr Blix reached an agreement on practical arrangements with Iraq on Tuesday, in theory allowing him to restart inspections on 19 October.

But at the Security Council on Thursday Mr Blix admitted that "loose ends" remained and that it would be "awkward" if he went to Iraq while the Council was still debating a new resolution.

The Russian President, Vladimir Putin, restated his preference that Mr Blix be allowed to deploy his teams without delay. Speaking in Moscow, he said he believed "that it's necessary to ensure the earliest deployment of the ... inspectors in that country".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in