US firm wins right to sue Diana's fund for £14m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A US company making Diana, Princess of Wales memorabilia was yesterday given the go-ahead to sue the memorial fund which was set up in her name, for £14m.
A US company making Diana, Princess of Wales memorabilia was yesterday given the go-ahead to sue the memorial fund which was set up in her name, for £14m.
A Los Angeles judge ruled that there was sufficient evidence for the company, Franklin Mint, to press ahead with its legal action against the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund. He set a date of 5 November for the hearing, to be held in California.
The court case is the latest move in the bitter six-year dispute between the two. Last July, the fund, which is worth £48m, froze all charitable grants, blaming the on-going legal action. While funds remain frozen, about 120 voluntary groups could be affected and up to 500 jobs at the fund and its beneficiaries are under threat.
The saga began in 1998 when the fund first took legal action to try to stop Pennsylvania-based Franklin Mint from selling Diana memorabilia. The action was unsuccessful, landing the fund with costs of £4m. Franklin then decided to counter-sue for £14m ($25m) for malicious prosecution in the original case.
The fund shrugged off the impending legal proceedings, insisting that the action was "groundless and implausible".
Andrew Purkis, chief executive of the fund, said: "We regret the waste of time and the interruption of much-needed humanitarian work among some of the world's most vulnerable people."
Last year, a spokesman for Franklin Mint said the fund had fought a "suicidal" legal action and should be held responsible for "bad behaviour".
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments