US federal judge rules Oklahoma ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional
Judge Kern said the state's law is "arbitrary and irrational"
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A US federal judge has ruled that Oklahoma’s ban on same-sex marriage violates the US Constitution, but stayed the effects of the ruling while the state’s courts decide how to proceed.
District Judge Terence Kern said that a law approved by voters in 2004 was “an arbitrary, irrational exclusion of just one class of Oklahoma citizens from a governmental benefit.”
The decision on the largely conservative southern state comes after a federal judge overturned a ban on same-sex marriage in the western state of Utah in early January.
Hundreds of couples had got married in Utah last year before the US Supreme Court intervened to stop weddings until the state’s courts sorted out the matter. The fate of gay marriage in Utah now rests in the hands of a federal appeals court in Denver.
Judge Kern cited the Utah situation in issuing the stay on his own ruling.
Read more:
The constitutional amendment approved by Oklahoma voters says that marriage in the state consists only of the union of one man and one woman, a measure which Judge Kern said violates the US Constitution’s equal protection clause.
“Equal protection is at the very heart of our legal system and central to our consent to be governed. It is not a scarce commodity to be meted out begrudgingly or in short portions.
"Therefore, the majority view in Oklahoma must give way to individual constitutional rights,” Kern wrote.
Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt's office, which has supported the law, did not immediately have a comment on the ruling.
Mary Bishop and Sharon Baldwin, a couple from the Oklahoman city of Tulsa, filed a lawsuit along with another same-sex couple in November 2004, shortly after voters overwhelmingly passed the constitutional amendment.
The couples sought the right to marry and have marriage from other states recognised in Oklahoma.
Judge Kern said that the Bishop couple have “been in a loving, committed relationships for many years" and they should be recognised as a married couple “with all its attendant rights and responsibilities.”
27 US states, other than Utah and Oklahoma, constitutionally prohibit same-sex marriage. Four more states, Indiana, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Wyoming do not permit it through state laws.
Additional reporting by AP
Read more:
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments