Presidential election: Voters can tell if they are participating in a ‘rigged’ ballot, according to research
The study showed that people knew when a voting system was flawed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The favourite theme of one of the presidential candidates has, for a number of weeks, been his allegation that the voting system is rigged.
Indeed, Donald Trump has made the claim so many times, that a recent report by Politico suggested that a full 41 per cent of voters believe the election could be “stolen” from them as a result of voter fraud - something experts on the US presidential election say is all but impossible to achieve.
Now, a study by Rice University in Houston has found that despite the political rhetoric, people have an inate sense of whether a voting system is secure or not.
In a study of 90 voters in a mock election, researchers assessed participants' perception of the security of three voting systems, each with different levels of security: a standard paper ballot (the least secure); a paper ballot with enhanced security mechanisms (one of the most secure); and a paper ballot that included fake security features to give the impression of enhanced security without actually doing anything to make the system safer.
The college said that after voting, each participant completed a survey that included questions about the security of the voting system they used so that the researchers could determine if one system of voting was perceived to be more secure than another.
Voters found the system with enhanced security mechanisms to be the most secure and were not deceived by the system with fake security elements.
“When US voters complete their ballot, they are providing confidential information in the form of their candidate or proposition selections, which may - or may not - align with the majority of voters’ beliefs and/or how other people want them to vote,” said Claudia Ziegler Acemyan, a postdoctoral research fellow in psychology.
“Accordingly, voters must trust the system to keep their votes anonymous and not record any type of identifying information that could link them to their ballots.”
She added: “If voters suspect any type of security flaws, then they might not see the point in participating in an election. This results in disenfranchisement, potentially impacted election results and possibly an overall lack of confidence in the resulting government and policies.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments