Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump praises as ‘excellent’ demand for media to name Ukraine whistleblower

Lawyers for official says client prepared to answer written questions

Andrew Buncombe
Seattle
Tuesday 05 November 2019 02:42 GMT
Comments
Senator Rand Paul demands for media to name Ukraine whistleblower

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump has doubled down on his call for the media to name the Ukraine whistleblower, praising such a proposal as “excellent”.

Appearing at an event in Lexington, Kentucky, where the president was purportedly campaigning on behalf on the incumbent governor but spoke much more about himself, Mr Trump invited to the stage senator Rand Paul.

Mr Paul claimed the whistleblower had once worked for Joe Biden and that the media knew his name.

“Congress needs to step up... and defend the president,” Mr Paul said. “To every Republican in Washington, step up and subpoena Hunter Biden and subpoena the whistleblower.”

“And, I say to the media, do your job and print his name.”

When Mr Trump retook the microphone, he said: “Wow, that was excellent. He’s a warrior.”

At the weekend, the president said something similar to reporters.

“There have have been stories written about a certain individual, a male, and they say he’s the whistleblower,” he said outside the White House.

“If he's the whistleblower, he has no credibility because he’s a Brennan guy, he’s a Susan Rice guy, he’s an Obama guy. And he hates Trump.”

He added: “Now, maybe it’s not him. But if it’s him, you guys ought to release the information.”

Whistleblower complaint over Trump's Ukraine call was credible

It emerged in September that the whistleblower, believed to be a member of the CIA, had made a formal complaint about the president’s 25 July phone call with the leader of Ukraine, when he is said to have pressured him to open an investigation into the alleged actions of the former vice president and his son, Hunter.

Mr Biden has always denied any wrong doing over his actions as part of an international effort to get rid of a prosecutor who appeared to be moving too slowly to investigate corruption, and there has never been any evidence to support it. Despite, this Republicans have leapt on the issue.

The whistleblower claimed Mr Trump had threatened to withhold military aid to Ukraine unless it launched the probe.

“In the course of my official duties, I have received information from multiple US government officials that the president of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 US election,” they wrote.

Mr Trump has denied any wrong and said his call with Ukraine’s leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, was “beautiful".

Yet it was enough for Democrats to launch a formal impeachment probe, something the House voted in favour of last week, with just two Democrats voting against.

There have been concerns about the safety of the whistleblower, amid demands for them to be named. Their lawyers last week released a statement, neither confirming nor denying their client’s identity but warning of the danger that comes with any disclosure.

“Any physical harm the individual and/or their family suffers as a result of disclosure means that the individuals and publications reporting such names will be personally liable for that harm,” they wrote. “Such behaviour is at the pinnacle of irresponsibility and is intentionally reckless.”

One of the lawyers, Mark Zaid, told CBS he offered to have Republicans on the House intelligence committee submit questions to their client.

The offer, which comes amid Republican complaints of unfair due process in the impeachment inquiry, would allow them to directly question the whistleblower without going through the Democratic-controlled committee.

Mr Trump appeared on behalf of Republican governor Matt Bevin, whose is facing an election against Democratic challenger, state attorney general Andy Beshear.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in