Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rudy Giuliani wants Twitter CEO jailed over limitations on unverified Hunter Biden story

'Maybe he’s working for the Chinese,' former mayor baselessly claims

Louise Hall
Thursday 29 October 2020 23:59 GMT
Comments
Rudy Giuliani enraged when Fox Business host compares him to Christopher Steele

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani has said that Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter should be “in jail” for blocking the spread of the controversial Hunter Biden story.

Twitter limited the spread of an unverified story published by The New York Post on Hunter Biden’s Ukraine links following its publication, flagging the story as “unsafe” as part of its new election posting rules.

In an interview on America This Week  on Thursday, the former New York mayor hit out at the CEO calling him “an accessory after the fact to the numerous crimes committed by Hunter Biden.”

Mr Giuliani then discusses his recent accusations that possible evidence of child endangerment was found on the alleged Hunter Biden laptop.

He then calls Mr Dorsey a “menace” and adds: “Put him in jail.”

The former mayor later lashed out at Mr Dorsey again while becoming visibly agitated, accusing him of “working for the Chinese.”

“Dorsey whether he committed a crime or not, he’s not an American. He’s something else, maybe he’s working for the Chinese,” he says.

He labelled the platform’s limitation of the spread as being “the worst invasion of rights in America” since “putting the Japanese in camps, except it’s being done to all of us.”

Twitter did not immediately respond to The Independent’s request for comment.

Mr Giuliani has facilitated a number of claims made in regard to data purported to have been taken from a laptop supposedly left at a Delaware repair shop and purported to be Hunter Biden’s.

The contents of the laptop have not been made fully public, nor fact-checked in full by reputable mainstream news organisations.

When asked if there was any legitimacy to a Homeland Security report alleging his son profited off the former vice president's name, Mr Biden said there was "none whatsoever" and that the “vast majority of intelligence people” said there was no basis to the claims.

"This is the same garbage from Rudy Giuliani, Trump's henchman, it's a last-ditch effort in this desperate campaign to smear me and my family," Mr Biden told Milwaukee's WISN 12 News.

The Biden campaign has also condemned the claims in The New York Post’s story and said the publication “never asked the Biden campaign about the critical elements of the story.”

Donald Trump previously lashed out at Facebook and Twitter for limiting the spread of the controversial and unverified story.

“So terrible that Facebook and Twitter took down the story of ‘Smoking Gun’ emails related to Sleepy Joe Biden and his son, Hunter in the @nypost,” tweeted Mr Trump.

“It is only the beginning for them There is nothing worse than a corrupt politician. REPEAL SECTION 230!!!”

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act designates tech companies as platforms rather than publishers, protecting platforms by meaning they’re not legally responsible for the content of their users.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in