Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

2020 election: Climate change major issue for voters in battleground states

Climate change is a major issue for voters in the US Presidential Election this year. 58 per cent of Americans said they were either ‘very concerned’ or ‘somewhat concerned’ about climate change.

Brad Plumer,Nadja Popovich
Tuesday 03 November 2020 22:58 GMT
Comments
An anti-global warming protester at Republican convention
An anti-global warming protester at Republican convention (AFP via Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Climate change has emerged as a major issue for voters this year, both nationally and in crucial battleground states like Arizona and Florida, new polls from the New York Times and Siena College suggest.

Nationwide, 58 per cent of Americans said they were either “very concerned” or “somewhat concerned” about their communities being harmed by climate change, according to a survey conducted in mid-October, with 39 per cent saying they were “not too concerned” or “not at all concerned”.

But that poll also found a stark partisan split: 90 per cent of voters who favoured Joe Biden, the Democratic nominee, expressed concern about climate change, while just 23 per cent of voters who backed Donald Trump, the Republican incumbent, did so.

The candidates could not be farther apart on the issue. Mr Trump has often dismissed global warming as a hoax and has moved to roll back environmental and climate regulations while in office. Mr Biden calls climate change an “emergency” and has proposed spending more than $2tn (£1.5tn) to overhaul the nation’s energy system and reduce greenhouse-gas emissions.

In a handful of key swing states, the New York Times and Siena College asked voters about their views on climate-related topics: rising sea levels in Florida, extreme heat in Arizona, support for fracking in Pennsylvania and the opening up of public lands for oil and gas development in Alaska.

Arizona

In Arizona, which endured a series of deadly, record-breaking heat waves in July and August, 57 per cent of likely voters said they were very or somewhat worried that rising temperatures from global warming would have a significant effect on their life, according to a Times/Siena poll released on Sunday.

Arizona’s voters are sharply polarised on the issue: 90 per cent of those supporting Mr Biden expressed worry about climate change, while just 22 per cent of those backing Mr Trump did. Overall, Mr Biden leads Mr Trump 49 per cent to 43 per cent among Arizona’s likely voters in the presidential race, the survey found.

Some voters said concern about rising temperatures factored into their decision. Marco Miranda, a registered nurse in Yuma, said he had voted for Mr Trump in 2016 but had voted early for Mr Biden this time around.

Climate change “certainly played a role,” Mr Miranda said, adding that he had not paid as much attention to the issue in the previous election. “I’m not a Democrat, but the Republicans don’t believe in science or climate change, and they’ve been rolling back all sorts of environmental and climate policies,” he said. “It’s fine to deregulate some things, but not that.”

For others, though, climate change remains a background concern. “I do feel like what we do as a nation can impact the environment, but there are so many other things in the world we should be concerned about,” said Alfred Rubio, a police officer in Gilbert, Arizona, who plans to vote for Mr Trump, citing abortion and immigration as two of his top issues.

Mr Rubio, who said he has previously worked outdoor construction jobs in Arizona, added that he was less worried about extreme heat. “Is it hot? Yeah, it’s really hot,” he said. “But that’s why we have air-conditioners. If this was truly a concern for people, we wouldn’t get as many people as we have flooding into Arizona from other states.”

There are signs that climate change could become a more prominent issue in Arizona over time: The state’s younger voters tended to be much more worried about rising temperatures, with 75 per cent of respondents ages 18 to 29 expressing concern, while just 51 per cent of those ages 65 and older did. Hispanic voters, a fast-growing demographic in Arizona, also expressed much higher levels of concern than did white voters.

Florida

In Florida, a state particularly vulnerable to flooding from sea level rise along the coast, 54 per cent of respondents said they were either “very worried” or “somewhat worried” that rising sea levels from global warming would have a significant effect on their life.

A partisan split was evident there, too: 82 per cent of Democrats and 58 per cent of independents expressed worry, while just 26 percent of Republicans did. Overall, Mr Biden led Mr Trump 47 per cent to 44 per cent among likely voters in Florida, the poll found.

Kelly Kaiser, an independent voter who lives in Bradenton, and owns a small interior design business, said she was very concerned about sea level rise. “I’m on the coast, my job is on the coast, and from what I’ve read, if water levels rise just 6 inches, we’re going to have a lot of flooding problems,” she said.

At the same time, she voted early for Mr Trump this year, in part because she trusts him more on the economy at a time when the coronavirus pandemic is roiling the country. “I’m afraid climate didn’t play a role in my vote this time,” she said. “Does that mean I’m not concerned about the environment? No. But at this moment, I have to save the business. In four years I may feel very differently.”

Vickie Campbell, a retiree in Dunedin, did feel differently this time. While she voted for Mr Trump in 2016, in large part because she didn’t want to vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton, she voted early for Mr Biden this year. “Climate wasn’t at all on my mind last time, but it is now,” she said. “I don’t like that Trump’s taken us out of the Paris climate agreement, and all the rollbacks around clean air and water are very concerning.”

Ms Campbell said that the images of wildfires out West over the summer and fall had brought climate change to the front of mind. “Seeing that, it makes you worry about your own area,” she said. “It’s fire out there, it’s water here, but you realise it’s only a matter of time before you’re affected, too.”

Pennsylvania

In Pennsylvania, a major producer of natural gas, Mr Trump has tried to win over swing voters by arguing that Mr Biden’s proposed climate policies would harm the state’s fossil fuel industry. But so far, those attacks do not seem to have given him a decisive advantage, a Times/Siena survey found.

Overall, 52 per cent of likely voters in Pennsylvania support fracking, a technique that has led to a boom in gas production in the state and helped create thousands of jobs, though it has also led to local pollution concerns. Just 27 per cent opposed fracking, while the rest said they didn’t know or declined to answer.

But in the presidential race, Mr Biden still leads Mr Trump among likely voters in Pennsylvania 49 per cent to 43 per cent, the poll found. Mr Biden has said he would not ban fracking altogether, though he does envision a transition away from oil and gas in the years ahead.

Margaret Watkins lives in Indiana County, where growth in the natural gas industry has partly offset a decline in coal mining in recent decades. She voted for Mr Trump in 2016 but plans to vote for Mr Biden this time. Her disapproval of the president’s immigration policies was a bigger factor than energy policy, she said, but she broadly agrees with Mr Biden’s approach to the latter.

While she supports fracking today because it underpins jobs in her area, she sees renewable energy as the future. “My dad and grandfather were in the coal mines, but you know those days are over,” she said. “We need to transition into future energy sources, cleaner energy sources.”

Alaska

In Alaska, the fastest-warming state in the country, 56 per cent of respondents said they were “very worried” or “somewhat worried” that global warming will have a significant effect on their life, with 43 per cent saying they were “not too worried or not at all worried”.

But Alaska’s economy also depends heavily on oil and gas production, and voters wrestled with those contradictions as well: 50 per cent of voters favoured opening up public lands in Alaska for oil and gas drilling, logging or other types of extraction, with just 39 per cent opposed.

Alaska has long been a Republican stronghold, but there are signs of a surprisingly competitive race this year: Mr Trump led Mr Biden 45 per cent to 39 per cent in the Times/Siena poll of likely voters, released in mid-October.

Some Alaska voters cited global warming as an important issue for them this year. Michael Rose, a 71-year-old clinical psychologist and political independent in Anchorage, said he voted third party in 2016 but plans to vote for Mr Biden this year. Climate change was a “moderately high factor” in his vote, he said, citing the effects that rising temperatures were having on wildfires and declining fish populations in the state. “I’m afraid we’re reaching the point of no return,” he said. “And from what I can see, Mr Trump does not even consider climate to be an issue.”

But Mr Rose also said he was in favour of opening up public lands in Alaska, including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, to oil and gas development. “We’re still going to need oil and gas in the future,” he said, “though hopefully we’ll be able to decrease that over time by using more renewable energy.”

How climate became a hot election issue

For decades, surveys have consistently shown that a majority of Americans accept the scientific evidence that global warming is real and caused by human activities such as burning fossil fuels. Polls have also found broad support for policies to lower planet-warming emissions and promote renewable energy sources like solar and wind power.

But over the past few years, pollsters have found evidence that voters are increasingly fired up about the subject. A recent study from Stanford University found that the “issue public” for climate change — those who feel that the issue is extremely important to them personally — had reached an all-time high of 25 per cent this year.

“That’s a big deal, because these are the people who write letters to lawmakers, donate to lobbying groups or vote based on the issue,” said Jon Krosnick, a professor of communication, political science and psychology at Stanford who has been conducting climate change polling for more than two decades. “That rise has come in the last few years, and I’ve never seen that magnitude of change on any issue,” he said.

Several factors could explain the uptick in concern over climate change, experts said. Much of the increase has been concentrated among Democrats, who may be reacting sharply to Mr Trump’s dismissal of global warming. A recent spate of disasters with links to climate change, including record breaking wildfires in the West and a string of hurricanes in the south, may be playing a role.

Mr Krosnick also cited increasingly widespread media coverage of global warming as a key factor. “Just about every year now we see headlines announcing that it’s the warmest year on record, or close to it,” he said. “It’s just a continued accumulation of evidence.”

New York Times 

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in