‘A backwards step’: Experts warn Amy Coney Barrett is a threat to IVF
Ms Barrett has historically supported organisations who are against both birth control and the in vitro fertilization process
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Amy Coney Barrett’s appointment to the US Supreme Court poses a threat to women’s reproductive rights, some experts have warned.
Ms Barrett, whose appointment will be confirmed on Monday, has historically supported organisations who are against both birth control and the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process.
When asked about her beliefs on IVF during her Senate nomination hearing this month, the conservative judge had avoided answering questions on the matter.
On that basis, America’s leading fertility doctors have spoken-out at president Donald Trump’s nomination, and argued that Ms Barret represented a step “backwards for womens' individual liberty."
Eve Feinberg, MD, an associate editor of the Fertility and Sterility journal, was among those who aired their concerns last week, as Business Insider reported.
She wrote in an editorial that “The seating of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court threatens those who seek to build a family through in-vitro fertilisation,"
Ms Barrett could complicate access to IVF, having publicly backed organisations such as Right to Life Michiana, who want certain aspects of the treatment to be criminalized.
"As we are getting more conservative administration and more conservatives on the Supreme Court, that infringement on privacy and on the physician-patient relationship is threatening our ability as physicians to care for our patients," added Ms Feinberg. "And quite honestly, it's threatening as a woman to not have choice over our bodies."
Considered extreme among anti-abortion activists, the organisation backed by Ms Barrett believes that life begins at fertilisation, or "fetal personhood".
Barbara Collura, president and CEO of RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association, warned that any legislation recognising embryos as legal persons could complicate the standard of IVF treatment, she told Business Insider.
That is because the process typically involves trying to fertilise as many embryos as possible, according to Ms Collura.
On Sunday, only two Republicans voted against bringing advancing Ms Barrett’s nomination to a final vote, in what president Donald Trump believes will be a late election boost.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments