America’s largest health insurer delays plan to refuse to pay for ER visits if it doesn’t believe emergency
This ‘offers a temporary reprieve for patients’, says chief executive of the American Hospital Association
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.America’s biggest health insurer has reportedly delayed plans to roll out a new policy allowing the company to refuse to pay for emergency room visits it deems “non-urgent”.
UnitedHealthcare will push back the plan until at least the end of the coronavirus pandemic, according to The New York Times.
The decision to delay the policy comes after the health insurance giant faced widespread opposition from the medical community.
The proposed plan, which would affect millions of people, had prompted concerns that it could force patients to try to assess their own medical issues before seeking out emergency care, which could risk delaying treatment, including lifesaving care.
The initiative had also sparked fears that it could see patients avoid going to the emergency room altogether - a trend already observed in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, with many afraid to visit hospitals during the outbreak and some also fearing the associated medical bills during a time of economic uncertainty.
The policy had previously been set to come into effect next month.
In a statement to NYT, Rick Pollack, the chief executive of the American Hospital Association, said the decision to hold off on the plans “offers a temporary reprieve for patients”.
However, he said the association is urging a “full and permanent reversal” of the initiative.
Ultimately, Mr Pollack said he believed the planned policy change been a “very misguided” endeavour – particularly in the midst of a pandemic.
While UnitedHealthcare has not suggest any plans to scrap the initiative entirely, it has said that “based on feedback from our provider partners and discussions with medical societies, we have decided to delay the implementation of our emergency department policy until at least the end of the national public health emergency period”.
When the emergency period will end, however, remains unclear and top US officials have not said what the situation would need to be for them to declare an official end to the crisis.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments