Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

America’s largest health insurer delays plan to refuse to pay for ER visits if it doesn’t believe emergency

This ‘offers a temporary reprieve for patients’, says chief executive of the American Hospital Association

Chantal da Silva
Monday 14 June 2021 21:35 BST
Comments
A staff member pushes a patient in a wheelchair at St Barnabas Hospital on 23 March, 2020 in the Bronx borough of New York City.
A staff member pushes a patient in a wheelchair at St Barnabas Hospital on 23 March, 2020 in the Bronx borough of New York City. (Getty Images)
Leer en Español

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

America’s biggest health insurer has reportedly delayed plans to roll out a new policy allowing the company to refuse to pay for emergency room visits it deems “non-urgent”.

UnitedHealthcare will push back the plan until at least the end of the coronavirus pandemic, according to The New York Times.

The decision to delay the policy comes after the health insurance giant faced widespread opposition from the medical community.

The proposed plan, which would affect millions of people, had prompted concerns that it could force patients to try to assess their own medical issues before seeking out emergency care, which could risk delaying treatment, including lifesaving care.

The initiative had also sparked fears that it could see patients avoid going to the emergency room altogether - a trend already observed in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, with many afraid to visit hospitals during the outbreak and some also fearing the associated medical bills during a time of economic uncertainty.

The policy had previously been set to come into effect next month.

In a statement to NYT, Rick Pollack, the chief executive of the American Hospital Association, said the decision to hold off on the plans “offers a temporary reprieve for patients”.

However, he said the association is urging a “full and permanent reversal” of the initiative.

Ultimately, Mr Pollack said he believed the planned policy change been a “very misguided” endeavour – particularly in the midst of a pandemic.

While UnitedHealthcare has not suggest any plans to scrap the initiative entirely, it has said that “based on feedback from our provider partners and discussions with medical societies, we have decided to delay the implementation of our emergency department policy until at least the end of the national public health emergency period”.

When the emergency period will end, however, remains unclear and top US officials have not said what the situation would need to be for them to declare an official end to the crisis.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in