Trump-era rules making it harder for violence victims to claim asylum overturned by Biden’s AG
Reversed rules made it more difficult for vulnerable people to claim asylum in the US
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The US Department of Justice has reversed a pair of Trump-era decisions that made it more difficult for vulnerable people to claim asylum in the US.
On Wednesday, the DOJ announced that Attorney General Merrick Garland had overturned the two decisions made by former Attorney Generals Jeff Sessions and William Barr.
The first decision, introduced by Mr Sessions and known as the Matter of A-B, had made it significantly more difficult for survivors of domestic violence or gang violence to qualify for asylum in the US.
The second, the matter of L-E-A, which was introduced by Mr Barr, had ruled that membership in a nuclear family did not qualify as a social group, meaning people whose families had been threatened could not expect to qualify for asylum on those grounds.
Both decisions were made through a unique “certification” power held by the US attorney general, allowing them to enforce far-reaching decisions through individual cases.
In a memo issued on Wednesday, Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta said Mr Garland was ordering immigration court judges to ignore the two decisions until a rulemaking process could be initiated with public comment.
Until then, immigration judges are expected to revert to the rules existing prior to the Trump-era orders being issued.
In her memo, Ms Gupta said the two decisions “involve important questions about the meaning of our Nation's asylum laws, which reflect America's commitment to providing refuge to some of the world's most vulnerable people”.
"Congress has authorised grants of asylum to those who, among other things, can show that they are fleeing persecution on account of their membership in a ‘particular social group,’" the associate attorney general said.
The “now-vacated decisions,” Ms Gupta said, “restricted the availability of asylum on that ground”.
“In today's decisions, the Attorney General explains that he is vacating L-E-A- II, A-B- I, and A-B- II to return the law to its preexisting status pending the rule-making process, which will allow these complex and important questions to be resolved with the benefit of full public comment,” her memo said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments