Top US circuses sued over 'gross cruelty' to elephants
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Two of the world's best-known circuses are accused by American animal welfare groups of cruel treatment of elephants.
Two of the world's best-known circuses are accused by American animal welfare groups of cruel treatment of elephants.
Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus have been targeted by the Performing Animal Welfare Society (Paws), the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the Fund for Animals and the Animal Welfare Institute. In a lawsuit, filed this week, they say the circuses have broken America's Endangered Species Act and other animal protection laws.
The lawsuit is part of a long-running campaign to apply animal welfare laws to circus animals, and bar circuses from using animals.
The groups claim the circuses broke the law by beating elephants to train them, forcibly removed baby elephants from their mothers and failed to prevent the use of physical abuse in training.
A circus spokeswoman Catherine Ort-Mabry rejected the accusations. "Animals are an integral part of the Ringling Brothers family, and we provide the highest standards of care,"' she said. "Animals have been an important part of our shows for 130 years."
Paws has made circus elephants one of its great causes, claiming their use not only involves cruelty but endangers the public. "Paws has presented to Congress voluminous documentation about the danger to which the public is exposed to from these frivolous and cruel performances," said a spokesman.
The organisation was founded in 1985 by Hollywood animal trainer and author, Pat Derby, and her partner, Ed Stewart. It maintains two sanctuaries for captive wildlife in California.
But the two circuses claim solid public support. They say a survey shows 80 per cent of Americans thought animals should be part of the circus, and a majority said they believed there was already enough regulation to protect the health and welfare of circus animals.
"All our members are committed to providing elephant care at the highest professional level, and we support the responsible public display of elephants as a vitally important means of increasing public awareness of and concern for these animals in human care and in the wild," said David Hagan, president of the Elephant Managers' Association.
The US Congress is considering a bill, the Captive Elephant Accident Prevention Act, which would all but ban circus elephants, proposed by Sam Farr, a Californian Democrat.
He said: "I am not interested in seeing the circus industry unduly hindered or encumbered. My bill is a practical, reasonable one that addresses a fundamental wrong in the entertainment industry."
Since 1983, he said, 28 people have been killed and 70 injured by performing elephants.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments