Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tesla driver burnt to death in car because futuristic doors wouldn’t open, prosecutors say

Destroyed vehicle that ‘loves to burn’ reignites again in pound

Reis Thebault
Thursday 24 October 2019 18:46 BST
Comments
A man has been burnt to death inside his Tesla Model S
A man has been burnt to death inside his Tesla Model S (George Szeto via REUTERS)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Omar Awan was driving his dream car when he lost control. The sleek, blue Model S Tesla careened across a road in South Florida and slammed into a palm tree.

But it wasn’t the crash that killed him, his family’s lawyers said – it was the car’s futuristic design features.

The last moments of Mr Awan’s life were gruesome and excruciating. After the crash, the Tesla’s lithium ion battery caught fire. Smoke – and then flames – filled the car, suffocating Mr Awan and burning him from his feet up. Outside, a crowd gathered, but couldn’t help.

That’s because the car’s retractable door handles, which are supposed to “auto-present” when they detect a key fob nearby, malfunctioned and first responders weren’t able to open the doors and save Mr Awan, alleges a wrongful-death lawsuit.

“The fire engulfed the car and burned Dr Awan beyond recognition – all because the Model S has inaccessible door handles, no other way to open the doors, and an unreasonably dangerous fire risk,” the complaint reads.

“These Model S defects and others,” the suit says, “rendered it a death trap.”

Mr Awan, a 48-year-old anaesthesiologist and father of five, leased the Model S for two reasons, family attorney Stuart Grossman said. He was environmentally sensitive and safety conscious.

Tesla, maker of electric vehicles, has also claimed that the Model S once achieved “the best safety rating of any car tested”.

So Mr Awan, who could have afforded a Mercedes or another luxury vehicle, went with the 2016 Tesla. And it killed him, Mr Grossman said.

“These things, they just love to burn,” he said. “The car is so over-engineered. It’s so techy, it makes you want to buy a Chevy pickup truck.”

Tesla’s public relations team did not respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit, filed in October, and the company’s lawyers have yet to respond in court.

But shortly after the February crash, a Tesla spokeswoman told the Florida Sun-Sentinel that “we are deeply saddened by this accident” but that “Tesla vehicles are engineered to be the safest cars in the world and Tesla drivers have driven more than 10 billion miles to date”.

Mr Awan’s death is one in a string of recent incidents that has been blamed on Tesla’s innovative technology.

A lawsuit stemming from a May 2018 crash that killed two teens also blamed a battery fire for at least one of the deaths. Mr Grossman represents the car’s third passenger, who survived the accident after being thrown from the vehicle.

In April, surveillance footage from a Shanghai parking garage showed smoke billowing from a Model S moments before the car burst into flames. The widely-shared video prompted Tesla to open an internal investigation.

Several other suits have attributed deaths to Tesla’s “Autopilot” system, an automatic driver-assistance feature.

“There are a number of these cases,” Mr Grossman said. “What the hell is going on?”

CCTV captures Tesla Model S bursting into flames in Shanghai, China

In Mr Awan’s case and in other crashes, the car manufacturer has argued that high-speed crashes can result in fires whether the car is powered by gasoline or batteries.

But Mr Awan survived the collision, and he could have escaped the smoke and fire, too, Mr Grossman said – if only the police officer who arrived on scene could have opened the car’s doors.

The lawsuit asserts that the features rendered the car “defective” and “dangerous” – the door handles compounding the problem of an “inherently unstable” battery.

“Tesla failed to warn users about the scope and extent of the defective and unreasonably dangerous conditions of the Model S,” the complaint says.

The Broward County autopsy report, obtained by The Washington Post, lists Mr Awan’s cause of death as “inhalation of products of combustion with a contributory cause of death of thermal injuries”.

The medical examiner who responded to the crash wrote that Mr Awan “was not identifiable on scene.”

His clothes and hair were burned and a yellow metal ring was found on his left ring finger.

After the crash, and after firefighters extinguished the blaze, Mr Awan’s Tesla was transported to a tow yard. Once there, it reignited and burned again.

Washington Post

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in