Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

States take no-smoking laws to great outdoors

Andrew Gumbel
Thursday 03 November 2005 01:01 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Voters in Washington state will be invited to approve the most draconian statewide anti-smoking law in the United States next week when they vote on whether to ban cigarettes and cigars from all public places - even cigar lounges - and create a 25ft no-smoking perimeter around public buildings.

Although polling has been less than definitive, the measure looks likely to pass and is being backed by a public health coalition. But it is being resisted by a loose group of smoking aficionados, and bar and restaurant owners who say it will be excessive and almost impossible to police effectively.

The county around Tacoma, 45 minutes south-west of Seattle, abandoned a similar ban last year because smokers simply migrated to the nearest Indian reservation, which has its own laws, taking their spending money with them.

A straw poll of residents in Seattle, which bans smoking in three-quarters of its bars and restaurants, suggested many people liked the idea of cracking down further on tobacco use but were uncomfortable with the severity of the measure.

Proponents of Initiative 901 are unapologetic, even about fears that they would drive cigar lounges out of business - or underground. Calls for exemptions, they argue, are the result of lobbying by tobacco interests.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in