Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Saudi Arabia insists it had nothing to do with 9/11 attacks and demands to be dropped from relatives' lawsuit

Relatives of those who died seeking billions in compensation from various countries

Andrew Buncombe
Friday 31 July 2015 18:56 BST
Comments
The twin towers of the World Trade Center billow smoke after hijacked airliners crashed into them early 11 September, 2001
The twin towers of the World Trade Center billow smoke after hijacked airliners crashed into them early 11 September, 2001 (HENNY RAY ABRAMS/AFP/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Saudi Arabia has insisted it had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks and demanded that it be dropped as a defendant in legal action being brought by some of the almost 3,000 people who were killed.

A lawyer for the country told a New York judge that there was no evidence to suggest Saudi Arabia knew of the attacks in advance or knowingly aided terrorists. Fifteen of the 19 hijackers were citizens of Saudi Arabia.

Michael Kellogg told the court that those individuals seeking legal redress had failed to produce “admissible, concrete, competent evidence” that Saudi Arabia was involved, but instead relied on innuendo and rumours to support their claims, according to the Associated Press.

Policemen and firemen run away from the huge dust cloud caused as the World Trade Center's Tower One collapses after terrorists crashed two hijacked planes into the twin towers, September 11, 2001 in New York City.
Policemen and firemen run away from the huge dust cloud caused as the World Trade Center's Tower One collapses after terrorists crashed two hijacked planes into the twin towers, September 11, 2001 in New York City. (Getty Images)

Mr Kellogg also argued that foreign nations were immune from such lawsuits and the plaintiffs had not shown any evidence that could overcome that burden.

Saudi Arabia was dropped as a defendant nine years ago by a judge who said it was protected by sovereign immunity, but a federal appeals court in December 2013 reinstated it, saying a legal exception existed and the circumstances were extraordinary.

Speaking for the relatives of those killed in the September 11 attacks, lawyer Sean Carter said the judge must decide whether there was sufficient evidence to find that Saudi Arabia’s agents provided the militants whose carried out the attack with “operational assistance”.

He said two Saudi government employees helped two September 11 hijackers who could not speak English find an apartment and get acclimated with the country when they first arrived in San Diego.

One of the Saudi employees, according to court papers, housed them for a time at his apartment, co-signed and guaranteed their lease and helped them open a bank account with $9,000 of his own money.

Mr Carter told The Independent there was an ongoing FBI probe looking at the possible involvement of Saudi officials. "There is also evidence that was not available to the 9/11 commission," he said.

Lawyers for the families say they have developed substantial new information against Saudi Arabia since the September 11 Commission said in a report a decade ago that it found no evidence that the Saudi government or senior Saudi officials individually funded Al Qaeda.

Mr Carter said some of the commission staff responsible for the Saudi part of the investigation had believed there was a Saudi connection, but other more senior officials made a "political decision" that there should be no allegations against a foreign entity that could not be proved 100 percent.

The lawsuits were brought in the aftermath of the attacks against a number of countries, companies and organisations accused of aiding Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups. They sought billions of dollars in damages.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in