San Jose becomes first US city to make gun owners cover cost of gun violence
Officials have not yet set a fee that will be charged for weapons
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.San Jose has become the first US city to require gun owners to cover the cost of gun violence.
The move comes after the May mass shooting at a transit yard in the city that left nine people dead.
The move was approved by the city council this week and will require every gun owner to buy liability insurance and pay an annual fee for gun-related emergency responses.
The city has not yet decided how much the fee will be and it will be set after the Pacific Institute on Research and Evaluation completes a gun harm study later this year.
In a preliminary report the institute estimated that gun-related incidents cost San Jose tax payers around $63m annually in direct out-of-pocket costs, jobs and quality of life, according to The San Francisco Chronicle.
The study estimates that between 2013 and 2019 gun violence, which saw 205 people shot, cost the city of San Jose an estimated $442m.
“While the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms, it does not require taxpayers to subsidize gun ownership,” said Mayor Sam Liccardo before the vote.
“We won’t magically end gun violence, but we will stop paying for it. We can also better care for its victims, and reduce gun-related injuries and death through sensible interventions.”
The mayor also said that data showed that gun violence cost the state of California $1.4bn in 2018.
The move is expected to face legal challenges from gun rights groups.
Liccardo is “quite confident” the city will win any legal challenges.
“When it comes to sensible gun regulation, no good deed goes unlitigated,” said Mr Liccardo.
“It’s fair to say there’s going to be a very active effort on the part of the legal community here in the Bay Area to ensure that whatever we pass is appropriately defended.”
The measures are part of gun control reforms that Mr Liccardo has been pushing since the mass shooting at the Gilroy Garlic Festival in 2019.
The city council passed one of his plans last month, which requires all purchases at gun shops to be video and audio recorded.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments