Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Smoking banned inside apartments in San Francisco — unless it’s cannabis

According to analysis, secondhand smoke causes more than 41,000 Americans a year 

Gino Spocchia
Thursday 03 December 2020 11:01 GMT
Comments
Wildfire smoke turns sky orange in San Francisco Bay Area

San Francisco residents will soon be banned from smoking inside apartments after a ban was backed in a vote — but with one exception.

Residents will still be able to smoke cannabis indoors, according to the ban, which was passed by The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Tuesday.

Supervisors voted 10-1 on the proposals, which were introduced by the board’s president, Norman Yee.

The ban prohibits smoking tobacco inside buildings with three or more apartments and in all common areas, while cannabis — both medial and non medial — are permitted.

Activists had argued that banning cannabis would take away their only legal place to smoke the substance, which is banned in public places in the Bay Area, ABC News reported.  

Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, who wrote the amendment to exempt cannabis, said: “Unlike tobacco smokers who could still leave their apartments to step out to the curb or smoke in other permitted outdoor smoking areas, cannabis users would have no such legal alternatives.”

Mr Yee, meanwhile, thanked supervisors who supported the ban in a Twitter post, and wrote he was happy to see San Francisco residents protected from secondhand smoke.

“Secondhand smoke causes harm, and everyone should have clean air to breathe where they live,” he added.  

San Francisco becomes the sixty-third Californian city to introduce such a ban, according to ABC News, while smoking tobacco was already banned in most public spaces.

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), tobacco smoke claims more than 480,000 American lives a year, with more than 41,000 deaths caused by secondhand smoke exposure.

Anyone who violates the San Francisco ban could face a $1,000 charge once the ban is backed in a second vote next week, which board supervisors are expected to do.

The proposals would then become law 30 days later.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in