Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Opponents of the decision by the San Francisco mayor, Gavin Newsom, to defy state law and allow marriage licences for gay and lesbian couples were appearing in court last night for hearings on the petitions of two groups.
By Monday night, 2,340 same-sex couples had taken their vows at City Hall since the "gender-neutral" marriage licences were introduced on Thursday. Hundreds of couples queued in a three-block-long line outside waiting to marry with the city's blessing.
"We felt that if we didn't make it by today we wouldn't be able to," said Deb Agarwal, 40, after she and her partner of six years, Diane Pizza, 55, were married by a city supervisor, one of the dozens of city officials deputised to officiate at the series of weddings.
In a brief for a court hearing, lawyers for the Alliance Defence Fund (ADF), which is trying to block gay weddings, said Mr Newsom was in violation of state law when he changed the rules. The mayor claims the equal protection clause of the California constitution makes denying marriage licences to gay couples illegal.
"The mayor and his cronies have attempted to short-circuit the legal process by being both judge and jury themselves," Benjamin Bull, a lawyer representing the ADF said.
The city's lawyers said local government agencies or officials are not barred from advancing their interpretations of the state constitution. They also claim plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that continuing to issue licences for same-sex couples would cause the irreparable harm necessary to obtain a court stay.
Denying same-sex couples the right to marry would cause greater harm, the city says.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments