Rudy Giuliani pressed Tillerson for help to release gold trader client who flouted Iran sanctions
Revelation comes as president's personal lawyer faces intense scrutiny over Ukraine scandal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.During a contentious Oval Office meeting with Donald Trump and former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson in 2017, Rudy Giuliani pressed for help in securing the release of a jailed client, an Iranian-Turkish gold trader, as part of a potential prisoner swap with Turkey.
The request by Mr Giuliani provoked an immediate objection from Mr Tillerson, who argued that it would be highly inappropriate to interfere in an open criminal case, according to two people briefed on the meeting.
The gold trader, Reza Zarrab, had been accused by federal prosecutors of playing a central role in an effort by a state-owned Turkish bank to funnel more than $10bn (£8bn) worth of gold and cash to Iran, in defiance of US sanctions designed to curb Iran’s nuclear program.
But at the White House meeting in early 2017, Mr Giuliani and his longtime friend and colleague, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, pushed back on Mr Tillerson’s objections.
Rather than side with his secretary of state, Mr Trump told them to work it out themselves, according to the two people briefed on the meeting. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to discuss the matter.
In the end, no such prisoner swap took place. But the episode has opened a new chapter in Mr Giuliani’s efforts to interject himself into the Trump administration’s diplomacy while at times representing clients with a direct interest in the outcome.
The Oval Office meeting occurred before Mr Giuliani became Mr Trump’s personal lawyer for the special counsel’s Russia investigation. In recent weeks, Mr Giuliani’s campaign to press Ukrainian officials to investigate the son of one of Mr Trump’s political rivals, former Vice President Joe Biden, has thrust him into the middle of the House impeachment inquiry. And on Wednesday, two of Mr Giuliani’s associates in that campaign were arrested on charges of violating federal campaign finance laws.
Mr Giuliani has defended his actions in the gold trader case, which were first reported on Wednesday by Bloomberg.
Well known for his hawkish views on Iran, the former mayor of New York said he had been willing to represent Mr Zarrab because the proposed prisoner swap would have secured the release of an American pastor who was being held in Turkey on terrorism-related charges the United States considered fabricated.
He likened his efforts to manoeuvres during the Cold War to trade enemy spies for Americans detained overseas.
Mr Giuliani questioned how his actions were any different. “It happened to be a good trade,” he said. “I expected to be a hero like in a Tom Hanks movie.”
The Zarrab case, called the single largest evasion of Iranian sanctions in US history, revolved around a scheme by the Turkish bank in 2012 and 2013 to send billions of dollars in gold and cash to Iran in exchange for oil and natural gas.
Mr Zarrab, who has Turkish and Iranian citizenship, was arrested in Florida in March 2016 on a family trip to Disney World, and accused of an illicit operation that relied on false documents and front companies to move the assets to Iran from the accounts of Halkbank, the second-largest state-owned lender in Turkey.
Getting him out of the United States was a high priority for Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, because Mr Zarrab had information that would later implicate senior bank officials, as well as Turkish government officials, in the scheme.
Indeed, after the prison swap failed, Mr Zarrab became a key witness and testified that in 2012, Mr Erdogan, then Turkey’s prime minister, had ordered that two Turkish banks be allowed to participate in the sanction-evasion scheme.
Mr Giuliani said that he was brought into the effort by Mr Mukasey, who had been hired by Mr Zarrab’s lawyer, Benjamin Brafman.
The two men had been pressing their case with Mr Trump in the Oval Office in early 2017 when Mr Tillerson joined the conversation, according to the two people briefed on the meeting. Mr Tillerson, who could not be reached for comment, was surprised to find Mr Giuliani and Mr Mukasey at what he thought would be a regular private meeting with the president, the people said.
Mr Trump asked Mr Giuliani to tell Mr Tillerson what he wanted, which prompted the then-secretary of state's objections.
Mr Mukasey’s spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.
Mr Giuliani, in the interview on Thursday, disputed the account provided to The New York Times of the discussion he had with Mr Tillerson about Mr Zarrab — and the assertion that Mr Tillerson replied that such a step was inappropriate. But Mr Giuliani did not specify what aspects of the account he found inaccurate, saying he could not discuss the meeting because of attorney-client privilege.
“This is a completely malicious story coming from the consistent attack on me to try to destroy my credibility,” Mr Giuliani said.
He added that at the time, “nobody ever complained” to him from the Trump administration about his role in the case.
Mr Giuliani and Mr Mukasey were persistent in the effort. Court filings show that they discussed the matter with State Department officials in Turkey before meeting with Mr Erdogan himself, and that Mr Sessions and Preet Bharara, then the US attorney for the Southern District of New York, were informed “on a confidential basis.”
Mr Giuliani argued in court filings that “none of the transactions in which Mr Zarrab is alleged to have participated involved weapons or nuclear technology, or any other contraband, but rather involved consumer goods, and that Turkey is situated in a part of the world strategically critical to the United States.”
And Mr Mukasey, in an April 2017 court filing, asserted that “senior US officials have remained receptive to pursuing the possibility of an agreement.”
But officials at the US attorney’s office in Manhattan remained opposed to the Zarrab trade, as did Mr Tillerson. Mr Giuliani, in the interview on Thursday, said he wasn’t sure why the proposal fell apart.
What’s clear is that Mr Zarrab pleaded guilty in November 2017 to the charges, and became a key witness in federal criminal cases prosecuted in New York that led to the conviction of Mehmet Hakan Atilla, an executive at Halkbank.
During Mr Atilla’s criminal trial in late 2017, the judge overseeing the case criticised Mr Giuliani’s role in trying to secure Mr Zarrab’s freedom, noting that such a move might benefit Iran.
“Most respectfully, the Giuliani and Mukasey affidavits appear surprisingly disingenuous in failing to mention the central role of Iran in the indictment, and indeed, failing to mention Iran at all in their affidavits,” the judge, Richard M Berman, said, citing statements in which the men suggested Mr Zarrab’s release might help the United States.
The New York Times
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments