Republicans and neo-cons call for 'arrogant' Rumsfeld to quit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary, is under attack from fellow Republicans on Capitol Hill for not sending more troops to Iraq, and for failing to provide enough protection for those who are there.
Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary, is under attack from fellow Republicans on Capitol Hill for not sending more troops to Iraq, and for failing to provide enough protection for those who are there.
Only a fortnight ago, the White House announced that President George Bush had asked Mr Rumsfeld, 72, to stay on into his second term. Since then at least four senior Republican senators, as well as William Kristol, the editor of The Weekly Standard, the neo-conservatives' house magazine, have called for his dismissal.
Mr Rumsfeld's latest troubles began when he shrugged off a US National Guardsman's complaint that military vehicles did not have adequate armour. "You have to go to war with the army you have, not the army you might like," he responded in words seized on by critics as evidence of arrogance and being out of touch with the reality of a war in which some 1,300 US soldiers have been killed.
The remark was "very troubling", said Senator Susan Collins of Maine, adding her voice to those of John McCain, Chuck Nagel and Trent Lott, the former Senate majority leader.
The US National Guard also announced yesterday that its recruiting was running 30 per cent below requirements, raising the risk of manpower strains. The Guard accounts for a quarter of total US troop strength in Iraq, crucial in the run-up to the elections scheduled for the end of January.
But for Mr Rumsfeld to step down now would amount to an admission that major mistakes had been made in Iraq - highly unlikely from a president who is famously reluctant to admit to the slightest error.
The grumbling is also audible within the military high command at the Pentagon, which has long been unhappy at Mr Rumsfeld's insistence on fighting the war in Iraq with what, in their view, is too small a force without enough armour.
General Norman Schwarzkopf, the commander in the 1990-91 Gulf War, said: "I was angry when he laid it all on the army, as if he, as the Secretary of Defence, didn't have anything to do with the army."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments