Firm blamed for US opioid crisis files for bankruptcy amid blizzard of multi-billion-dollar lawsuits
Company owned by Sackler family aims to resolve thousands of lawsuits worth billions of dollars
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.US drug company Purdue Pharma has filed for bankruptcy as it faces more than 2,500 lawsuits worth billions of dollars, in relation to its alleged role in America’s opioid crisis.
The company, owned by the Sackler family, manufactured the opioid-based drug OxyContin – marketed as a narcotic painkiller and which has been blamed for a sharp rise in addiction, prescription drug abuse and fatal overdoses.
The company has denied any wrongdoing.
The bankruptcy is part of a framework designed to settle the legal claims and provide further funding to fight opioid addiction in the US.
“This court-supervised process is intended to, among other things, facilitate an orderly and equitable resolution of all claims against Purdue, while preserving the value of Purdue’s assets for the benefit of those impacted by the opioid crisis,” the pharmaceutical firm said in a statement.
According to Reuters, the Sackler family said: “It is our hope the bankruptcy reorganisation process that is now under way will end our ownership of Purdue and ensure its assets are dedicated for the public benefit.”
The majority of the lawsuits come from state and county governments, and while many have agreed to the terms of Purdue’s tentative settlement, others have rejected it and have said they intend to pursue members of the Sackler family through court.
“My office is prepared to hold the Sacklers accountable, regardless of whether or not Purdue declares bankruptcy,” Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul said in a statement last week.
The terms of the bankruptcy are reportedly worth $10bn (£8bn) and could rise to $12bn over time, including at least $3bn from the Sackler family.
The deal also calls for handing the company over to trustees and giving future profits from OxyContin and drugs in development to creditors.
The Sackler family was listed by Forbes magazine as one of the 20 wealthiest in the US in 2016. In a court filing last week, the New York attorney general’s office contended the family had transferred $1bn to itself through a Swiss and other hidden bank accounts, AP reports.
Lawyers representing some areas have said Purdue’s tentative settlement didn’t hold the Sacklers or the company sufficiently accountable for their roles in causing an opioid crisis that has killed more than 400,000 Americans in the last two decades.
In court filings, the family and the company have pushed back against accusations that the company played a central role in causing the national crisis by overselling the benefits of its powerful prescription painkillers and downplaying the addiction risk.
The company’s drugs represent a small fraction of the prescription opioids shipped over the years, and most fatal overdoses have been linked to illegal opioids such as heroin and illicitly made fentanyl.
Steve Miller, chairman of Purdue’s board of directors, said on a conference call with reporters that an admission of wrongdoing is not part of the deal.
“The alternative is to not settle but instead to resume the litigation,” he said.
He said as legal battles linger, the company’s costs grow, leaving less for the plaintiffs in lawsuits.
“The resumption of litigation would rapidly diminish all the resources of the company and would be lose-lose-lose all the way around,” he said. “Whatever people might wish for is not on the table now.”
Additional reporting by agencies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments