‘Nuclear explosion level bad’: How US press reported Prince Andrew interview
American media outlets react to ‘car-crash’ grilling received by Duke of York
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Prince Andrew’s attempted defence of his controversial friendship with billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein has made waves across the Atlantic, where media outlets observed the Duke of York endured a “car crash” interview.
Widespread criticism in Britain of Prince Andrew’s response to questioning during a BBC Newsnight special on Saturday did not escape the attention of press in the US.
During the course of the interview, Andrew discussed allegations he had underage sex with teenage girls, and addressed his friendship with Epstein, who was found dead in a New York City jail earlier this year while facing sex crime charges.
The duke said he had “let the side down” by visiting Epstein in New York City when he was released from jail after pleading guilty to paedophilia charges.
When confronted with allegations he had engaged in sex repeatedly with accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Prince Andrew rebutted the claims, insisting he does not recall meeting Ms Giuffre and suggesting a photograph of the pair together may have been “doctored”.
The royal has repeatedly denied engaging in any unlawful acts.
The interview was widely covered in the US press, including a headline from the New York Post focussing on his defence of allegations relating to Ms Roberts Giuffre. “Prince Andrew claims photo with Epstein ‘sex slave’ is fake because he doesn’t hug”, the tabloid wrote.
The New York Times, said Britain had been “appalled” by the programme, adding viewers were left “incredulous” by the answers Andrew gave in response to a “polite-but-relentless grilling” from presenter Emily Maitlis.
Meanwhile, The Washington Post’s coverage highlighted analysis by Charlie Proctor, editor of the Royal Central website, who branded the interview “nuclear explosion level bad”.
USA Today focused on the duke’s claim he had no recollection of posing for a photograph with Ms Roberts Giuffre, along with his suggestion the photo may have been doctored.
CNN reported that the interview was widely regarded as a “car crash”, adding the British media had “lambasted” the prince over his performance.
CBS News observed the interview was a “high-stakes gamble” for the duke, suggesting UK press believed he had been left with no other choice by to address the scandal after “months of tawdry headlines”.
Bloomberg however took a slightly different approach on its Twitter account, drawing attention to dozens of satirical reviews posted for the Woking branch of Pizza Express, after Prince Andrew claimed he had been at the restaurant with his daughter on the night he is alleged to have had sex with Ms Roberts Giuffre in 2001.