One year on, US charges Ahmed Khattalah over Benghazi consulate attack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nearly a full year after the deadly attack on its consular compound in Benghazi, the United States has taken a first concrete step towards fulfilling its promise to bring the perpetrators to justice filing criminal charges against several suspects including a Libyan militia leader, according to unconfirmed media reports.
Sources in Washington told CNN that the Justice Department believes the leader, Ahmed Khattalah, was directly involved in the attack which cost the lives of the US Ambassador in Libya, Christopher Stevens, and three others. The charges against him are under seal and are the first to emerge from the case. It was unclear how many other suspects were named or what the precise nature of the charges against them was.
Pressure has been growing on the administration of Barack Obama, especially from its critics on Capitol Hill, to show some progress in its FBI-led investigation into the attack which it first characterised as having been spurred by a mob angered by an American amateur film that was seen as being offensive to Muslims. Some Republicans have argued that the White House and the then Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, had sought to cover up the reality that it was a terrorist attack to avoid hurting President Obama’s re-election.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments