Oil rig safety device was defective
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The chairman of a congressional subcommittee said yesterday that it had uncovered significant problems with the device that was supposed to cut the oil flow after BP's oil rig exploded, creating a massive unchecked spill.
Representative Bart Stupak, head of the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, said the rig's underwater blowout preventer had a leak in its hydraulic system and the device was not powerful enough to cut through joints to seal the drill pipe.
He said the panel also discovered that the blowout preventer had been modified, which made it difficult to operate after the accident. Mr Stupak added that the device's emergency back-up controls may have failed because the explosion that destroyed the rig also disabled communications.
"The safety of its entire operations rested on the performance of a leaking and apparently defective blowout preventer," Mr Stupak said.
Senior executives involved in the Gulf of Mexico disaster returned to Capitol Hill yesterday for the second day of hearings.
Jack Moore, president of Cameron International Corp, which built the blowout preventer, said that it was "far too early" to draw conclusions on what caused the accident.
He said that the company has not been able to examine the blowout preventer. REUTERS
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments