NYT walks back on controversial Tom Cotton op-ed after widespread outrage
Climb-down comes after widespread condemnation over Tom Cotton’s comments
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Republican senator Tom Cotton has accused The New York Times of “surrendering to the mindless woke mob” after the paper admitted his op-ed, entitled “Send in the troops”, did not meet its own editorial standards.
Mr Cotton used the opinion article to echo Donald Trump’s threats about using the US military against crowds protesting police brutality and institutionalised racism after George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis police custody last week.
“One thing above all else will restore order to our streets: an overwhelming show of force to disperse, detain and ultimately deter lawbreakers,” wrote Mr Cotton in the op-ed published on Wednesday.
Numerous Times journalists and commentators soon criticised the piece amid concerns that Mr Cotton was calling on troops to escalate encounters between law enforcement and demonstrators.
Others wrote amid the backlash on Twitter that “Running this put Black @nytimes staffers in danger”.
In a statement issued on Thursday, the paper admitted that the publication of Mr Cotton’s op-ed did not meet its own editorial standards.
“We’ve examined the piece and the process leading up to its publication,” said Eileen Murphy, a Times’s spokeswoman. “This review made clear that a rushed editorial process led to the publication of an op-ed that did not meet our standards.
The spokeswoman added that The Times would examine its publication process, and reduce the amount of opinion pieces it publishes.
The climb-down comes after James Bennet, the newspaper’s editorial page editor, said that the Op-eds publication meant “debating influential ideas openly”.
He said on Thursday: “Readers who might be inclined to oppose Cotton’s positions need to be fully aware of it, and reckon with it, if they were to defeat it.”
According to The Time’s statement, it admitted that Mr Bennet had not read Mr Cotton’s piece prior to publication.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments