Oklahoma considers banning consensual nudes before marriage
The law would make viewing ‘obscene material’ a felony crime
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An Oklahoma lawmaker has introduced legislation that would make it a crime to send nudes to your significant other unless you’re married.
Oklahoma Senate Bill 1976 was prefiled by Republican State Senator Dusty Deevers of District 32 in advance of the state’s legislative session which starts on 5 Febuary 2024.
The bill largely targets child pornography but also takes aim at what the lawmaker calls “unlawful pornography”.
The term is defined as “any depiction of individual image stored or contained in any format on any medium including, but not limited to, film, motion picture, videotape, photograph, negative, undeveloped film, slide, photographic product, reproduction of a prographic product, play or performance” that pertains to several sexual acts outlined in the legislation.
However, the proposed bill does not “prevent spouses from sending images of sexual nature to each other.”
If passed, the law would be enforced similarly to Texas’ abortion bounty hunter bill. Any person who is not an officer or employee of a state or local governmental entity may bring civil lawsuits against anyone who produces or engages in such content.
Plaintiffs could be awarded $10,000 for each image or depiction produced in addition to court costs and attorneys fees. Separately, anyone found to have even viewed such content could be found guilty of a felony crime, while participating in the images a misdemeanor.
It’s not the only piece of controversial legislation the lawmaker has introduced; he previously drafted a bill banning no-fault divorces that would have struck down reasons like abandonment, adultery, extreme cruelty and fraudulent contract as reasons to end a partnership.
Pornography is typically protected under the 1st Amendment along with other forms of expression such as speech, the press, assembly and the right to petition the government. There are some notable exceptions to this however, like child pornography.
Similar bills have been introduced in Louisiana, California and North Carolina as pornography has become a hot-button issue for Republicans. In 2016, the Republican Party declared pornography a “public health crisis”.