NSA surveillance: Court says US government's collection of mass data is illegal
Court has asked Congress to step in
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In an embarrassing blow to the Obama administration, a court has ruled that the collection of mass data from Americans' phone records is illegal.
The Associated Press said a court in New York said the bulk collection of phone records by the government exceeds what Congress has allowed. The federal appeals court asked Congress to step in and decide how best to protect national security and privacy interests.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the law the government was relying on to justify its actions – Section 215 of the Patriot Act – did not permit the actions on such a scale.
The American Civil Liberties Union, a campaign group that had brought a legal challenge to the government, said the ruling was a "landmark" decision.
“This decision is a resounding victory for the rule of law,” said ACLU lawyer Alex Abdo, “For years, the government secretly spied on millions of innocent Americans based on a shockingly broad interpretation of its authority."
US Attorney General Loretta Lynch said the government was examining the court's announcement. "We are reviewing that decision," Ms Lynch said on Capitol Hill, according to Reuters.
Secret NSA documents leaked in 2013 to journalists by contractor Edward Snowden revealed that the agency was collecting phone records and digital communications of millions of citizens not suspected of crimes and prompting congressional reform. Mr Snowden remains exiled in Russia.
A three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan permitted the National Security Agency programme to continue temporarily as it exists, and all but pleaded for Congress to better define where the boundaries exist.
“In light of the asserted national security interests at stake, we deem it prudent to pause to allow an opportunity for debate in Congress that may (or may not) profoundly alter the legal landscape,” said the opinion written by Circuit Judge Gerald Lynch.
“If Congress decides to authorize the collection of the data desired by the government under conditions identical to those now in place, the program will continue in the future under that authorization.”
It added: “If Congress decides to institute a substantially modified program, the constitutional issues will certainly differ considerably from those currently raised.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments