Controversial influencer couple who euthanised dog refused to adopt baby because of social media ban
Couple decided not to adopt from Thailand after realising they would not be able to post child online
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A pair of Nashville YouTubers are facing backlash for the second time in a matter of weeks after an old video of them cancelling a potential child adoption resurfaced online.
Nikki and Dan Phillipi recently made headlines after they announced in a video on their YouTube channel that they had euthanised their dog, Bowser, after he bit their son.
Social media users were quick to hit out at the couple, asking why they didn’t attempt to rehome the dog with another family rather than put it down.
Now, the couple is facing another controversy again after a 2018 video posted to their channel resurfaced following the incident involving their dog.
In the old clip, the pair explain that they are no longer choosing to adopt a child from Thailand due to the country’s social media policy surrounding adoptions.
In the video, Ms Phillipi says the agency called her to “make sure [they] are aware of their social media policy”.
“What social media policy?,” the young woman recalls in disbelief while laughing. “I had no idea.”
She explains: "After you pick up your child, they are your child, but you are not allowed to talk about them or share any images, photos, videos, anything about them online for a year."
"I mean, Nikki’s got a YouTube channel, and we share a whole lot,” her husband, Mr Phillipi, adds.
The couple noted that the adoption would also not be finalised until a year after they initially adopted their child, which they explained they would not be comfortable with.
"The kid is gonna be living here in our house for a year and that whole time, it’s not our kid. So, not okay with that either," Mr Phillipi added.
Holt International, the adoption agency referenced in the video, told Business Insider that Thai adoption law restricts the release of an "adopted child’s information, photos, videos and films to mass media or Internet before finalisation”.
Social media users were quick to hit out at the couple, accusing them of wanting to adopt a child for “profit” through the creation of content for the page.
One user said the video had “aged like milk” while another user said: “If you wanted a baby for content and a paycheck, you don’t deserve a baby.”
The family and lifestyle vlogger currently has over 1.27 million subscribers on her YouTube account.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments