Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

New York police cleared over wedding-day shooting of groom

David Usborne
Saturday 26 April 2008 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A judge in New York yesterday cleared three detectives of all charges relating to the shooting of a young groom in November 2006, who died after he left a Queens strip club with friends, hours before his wedding.

The officers fired 50 bullets, killing Sean Bell and injuring two friends as they drove away from the club.

The detectives were investigating alleged prostitution at the Kalua club.

The verdict triggered cries of protest in and outside the courtroom after a trial that has gripped the city's media for seven weeks.

"There is no justice in America," cried one man outside the courthouse after the verdict. Among those who walked out in protest were Mr Bell's parents and the civil rights activist the Reverend Al Sharpton.

The defendants – detectives Gescard Isnora, Michael Oliver and Marc Cooper – waived the right to a jury arguing that any panel would be biased against them because of the publicity surrounding the case. Charges against them included first- and second-degree manslaughter.

However, Judge Arthur Cooperman said the prosecution had failed to prove that the officers had over-reached their authority in firing the shots. "The testimony of those witnesses just didn't make sense," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in