New York judge hears arguments on whether chimps deserve ‘personhood’
Case centres on two chimpanzees at a New York university
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Attorneys representing two chimpanzees began their arguments on Wednesday in a New York court on whether the chimps deserve full “personhood” and the rights that accompany that distinction.
Hercules and Leo are at the centre of this landmark case and their attorneys from the Nonhuman Rights Project say they are unlawfully imprisoned and are asking the court to free the chimps, according to reports.
Steven Wise, head attorney for the chimps, says they are “autonomous and self-determined beings” who deserve freedom of their bodies. In court Wednesday Mr Wise cited studies on chimp intelligence and emotions, saying they share too many traits with humans to be considered less than a person.
The Nonhuman Rights Project is seeking to have Hercules and Leo removed from their university housing and moved to a chimp sanctuary in Florida, where more than 250 chimps live.
The defence has said that this case is a “radical attempt” to expand protections that could lead to people challenging zoos and even household pets, according to a court brief.
Precedent in this case appears to favour the defence, as last year a New York appeals court ruled that a chimp named Tommy is not a legal person. The judge in that case wrote that chimps deserve protection, but are not true members of society and cannot legally be punished for their actions.
Wednesday marked only the opening arguments in the case and it could be another two months before a decision in made. The chimps were not in court on Wednesday.
Follow @PaytonGuion on Twitter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments