Muslim groups win right to pursue civil rights abuse lawsuit against New York Police Deparment
The groups allege the force of conducting secret surveillance of Muslims without suspicion of criminal activity
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A coalition of Muslim groups has been told it can pursue a civil rights lawsuit that accuses New York City police of conducting secret surveillance of Muslims without suspicion of criminal activity.
A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that the groups can make the claim that the counter-terrorism programme violated their rights. The decision by the court in Philadelphia reversed a lower court’s decision to throw out the case.
“We have learned from experience that it is often where the asserted interest appears most compelling that we must be most vigilant in protecting constitutional rights,” Circuit Judge Thomas Ambro wrote for a three-judge panel, according to Reuters.
The anti-terror programme, which was carried out in the state of New Jersey, became widely known after a series of articles by the Associated Press, which reported that police officers were infiltrating Muslim organisations throughout the greater New York region in the wake of the attacks of September 11 2001.
New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, who criticised the effort on the campaign trail, ended the programme after taking office in 2014.
The plaintiffs in the case, including New Jersey imams, business owners and students, sued New York in 2012, claiming the surveillance subjected them to discrimination, threatened their careers and caused them to stop attending religious services.
But Judge William Martini in Newark, New Jersey, dismissed the case in February 2014, finding the city had persuasively argued that the surveillance was an anti-terrorism, not an anti-Muslim, programme. The appeals court decision does not resolve the merits of the case but returns the lawsuit to Mr Martini for further proceedings.
“There is no Muslim exception to the Constitution,” said Baher Azmy, legal director for the Centre for Constitutional Rights, which represents the plaintiffs along with Muslim Advocates.
The case is one of several lawsuits filed against New York over the programme; the New York Civil Liberties Union brought a similar claim in Brooklyn federal court in 2013.
In addition, a group of civil rights lawyers filed papers in Manhattan federal court, claiming the surveillance runs afoul of a longstanding court order limiting how the police can monitor political activity.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments