The real reason Michael Cohen's testimony could be dangerous for Trump
Could directly implicate president in effort to conspire with a foreign power - something Mr Trump has always denied
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.President Trump has angrily denied claims that his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, is willing to testify that Mr Trump knew and approved of the 2016 meeting between his son Donald Jr. and Russian government officials.
The meeting saw the Trump campaign offered “very high level and sensitive information" as part of "Russia and its government’s support for Mr Trump”.
The president regularly insists he did not know of the meeting.
If true, this revelation would directly implicate Mr Trump himself in an effort to conspire with a foreign power to tip the election to him, and a subsequent cover-up effort.
US commentators are saying the importance of this story may not lie in what Cohen is willing to say about Trump’s alleged knowledge of this meeting.
Rather, the further unravelling of the Cohen-Trump relationship could lead Mr Cohen to share previously undisclosed information about other matters related to Mr Trump's relationship with Russia that are still shrouded in mystery.
Mr Cohen alleges that he was present, along with several others, when Mr Trump was informed of the Russians’ offer by Trump Jr.
According to Mr Cohen’s account, it was Mr Trump who approved proceeding with the Russian meeting.
But it must be remembered that Mr Cohen is a disgruntled ex-employee of Mr Trump's. He may have a score to settle.
Mr Trump's present lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, says the version of events that are supposedly about to be put forward by Mr Cohen never happened.
The testimony of Mr Cohen could also prove useful in answering other areas of interest identified by Robert Mueller's inquiry.
Special Counsel Mueller allegedly has evidence that Mr Cohen secretly travelled to Prague in the summer of 2016 to discuss concealment strategies with Russian officials over the extent of his then-employer's links to Moscow.
Mr Cohen adamantly refutes this.
So far, no evidence has been publicly produced to prove that Mr Cohen's Prague meeting did actually happen.
“Cohen may have other things to say about the Trump-Russia connection beyond the Trump Tower meeting,” said Bob Bauer, the former White House counsel under President Barack Obama.
“What else does he know about the Trump campaign’s planning to extract maximum benefit from the Russians? This is just the opening salvo.”
The Washington Post
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments