Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Meng Wanzhou: Detained Huawei executive could have to wait years for extradition ruling, court hears

Case has strained relations between China and Canada

Tessa Vikander,Moira Warburton
Monday 20 January 2020 22:00 GMT
Comments
Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou leaves her home in Vancouver ahead of the first day of her extradition hearing
Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou leaves her home in Vancouver ahead of the first day of her extradition hearing (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A lawyer for Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou argued on Monday that "double criminality" was at the centre of a trial to decide whether she can be extradited to the United States, a case that has strained relations between Ottawa and Beijing.

Meng, 47, arrived in a Vancouver courtroom wearing a dark top with polka dots, for the first phase of a trial that will last at least four days, as China repeated its call for Canada to release her.

Legal experts have said it could be years before a final decision is reached in the case, since Canada's justice system allows many decisions to be appealed.

The United States has charged Meng with bank fraud, and accused her of misleading HSBC Holdings Plc about Huawei Technologies Co Ltd's business in Iran.

Court proceedings show the United States issued the arrest warrant, which Canada acted on in December 2018, because it believes Meng covered up attempts by Huawei-linked companies to sell equipment to Iran, breaking US sanctions against the country.

Meng, the daughter of Huawei's billionaire founder Ren Zhengfei, remains free on bail in Canada, and has been living in a mansion in Vancouver's exclusive Shaughnessy neighbourhood.

She has said she is innocent and is fighting extradition in part because her alleged conduct was not illegal in Canada, an argument known legally as "double criminality".

Unlike the United States, Canada did not have sanctions against Iran at the time Canadian officials authorised commencing with the extradition, her lawyers have said.

The central issue is "double criminality" defence lawyer Richard Peck told the court.

"Would we be here in the absence of US sanctions law, and ... our response is no," Peck said.

"In a typical case double criminality is not contentious. This case however is founded on an allegation of breach of use sanctions, sanctions which Canada has expressly repudiated," he added.

"Sanctions drive this case," Peck said.

The courtroom was packed with only standing room available, with more than 100 people in the gallery.

Meng's legal team is currently only scheduled to call evidence in the last week of April, and a second phase of the trial, focusing on abuse of process and whether Canadian officials followed the law while arresting her, is set to begin in June. Closing arguments are expected in the last week of September and first week of October.

The case has had a chilling effect on relations between Ottawa and Beijing. China has called Meng's arrest politically motivated.

Boris Johnson on Huawei access to 5G network

US President Donald Trump told Reuters in December 2018 he would intervene in Meng's case if it served US national security interests or helped close a trade deal with China. Chrystia Freeland, Canada's foreign minister at the time, quickly warned Washington not to politicise extradition cases.

"The resolve of the Chinese government to protect Chinese citizens' proper legal rights is firm and unwavering," foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang told reporters during a daily briefing. He called Meng's case a "serious political matter".

Huawei said in a statement that it stands with Meng in her pursuit of justice and freedom. "We trust in Canada's judicial system, which will prove Ms. Meng's innocence," it added.

Richard Kurland, a federal policy expert and lawyer not involved with the case, called Meng's double criminality argument around the absence of Canadian sanctions against Iran a sure bet.

"I think the defence has a slam dunk. There are no Iranian sanctions in Canada and anything (the prosecutors bring up) that's related to an Iranian sanction in Canada may well be dismissed," he said.

Soon after Meng's arrest, China detained two Canadians, former diplomat Michael Kovrig and businessman Michael Spavor. China has denied their arrests were related to Meng's case.

"The clear priority of everyone in our government ... is the release and well-being of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor. That is at the heart of all the work we are doing and rightly so," Freeland, now Canada's deputy prime minister, told reporters in Winnipeg on the sidelines of a cabinet retreat.

Meng's legal team argued in November that she could not be extradited as Canada did not have sanctions against Iran at the time Canadian officials authorised commencing with the extradition, meaning her conduct was not illegal.

Interpol secretary general explains why Meng Hongwei was removed as president

In response, Canada's attorney general said Meng was arrested on charges of fraud and misleading HSBC, which is a crime in both countries.

"Our government has been clear that we are a rule of law country and that we honour our extradition treaty commitments. That is what we need to do and that is what we will do," Freeland said.

Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in