Martha Stewart abandons fight to stay out of prison
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Martha Stewart, the lifestyle icon convicted of lying and obstructing justice in an insider trading trial earlier this year, said yesterday she was dropping her fight to stay out of jail and wanted to serve her sentence as soon as possible.
"I want to put this nightmare behind me. I want to reclaim my good life and good works and allow others to do the same," she said in an emotional announcement at the Manhattan headquarters of her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. True to her persona as the perfect housekeeper, Stewart, who was given a five-month sentence, said she wanted to be free in time to plant her spring garden next March.
Stewart had fought tooth and nail to stay out of prison pending an appeal of her sentence. The trial judge, Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum, had granted Stewart's request for a stay, enabling her to remain a free woman while her lawyers continued to contest her case.
Her change of heart appears to have been motivated by business concerns. Advertisers with her lifestyle magazines complained that their interests would be better served if she simply did her time and allowed the cloud to be lifted from herself and her company.
Shortly after her sentencing in July, executives at Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia announced a round of financial losses they blamed on "negative effects of Martha Stewart's personal legal situation".
The 63-year-old entrepreneur was a byword for domestic perfection until she was caught up in an insider trading scandal concerning shares in the bio-medical company ImClone Systems run by a friend of hers, Samuel Waksal. According to prosecutors, she sold her stock in the company following a tip from Mr Waksal in late 2001 that the Food and Drug Administration was about to criticise a new cancer drug in development. Stewart was not convicted of insider trading, but she was found guilty of obstructing justice and lying to investigators.
She was aware that the appeals process could be slow, but last week she learnt it was likely to be delayed well into next year because lawyers for her former stockbroker and co-defendant, Peter Bacanovic, had asked for more time. Stewart understood her appeal would be delayed so it could be heard concurrently with his.
Yesterday she told a news conference: "While I and my attorneys firmly believe in the strength of [my] appeal, recent delays and extensions have now made it abundantly clear that my appeal will not be heard until some time next year. So I have decided to serve my sentence now."
She also said she found the prospect of prison "frightening and difficult". And she added: "I am very sad that I will miss the holiday seasons Hallowe'en, Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years - always an opportunity to celebrate family, friends and religious traditions that mean so much to many of us."
Ms Stewart's lawyers hope she can serve her sentence at a minimum security camp for women in Connecticut, where she has one of her two homes.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments