Man found not guilty of raping wife as he believed he could have sex with her when he liked
Decision found court failed to establish the defendant knew his behaviour was criminal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An Ottawa man has been found not guilty of sexually assaulting his wife because he believed he had the right to have sex with her whenever he felt like it.
The decision, issued this week, found the court had failed to establish the man knew his behaviour was criminal.
“I find that the accused probably had sex with his wife on many occasions without her specific consent, as both he and she believed that he had the right to do so,” Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Smith said.
The woman, a Palestinian who grew up in Kuwait before moving to Canada, said that during their arranged marriage, she believed it was her obligation to have sex with her husband.
Although she did not always consent, the couple both believed it was the husband’s right, the Ottawa Citizen reported.
The couple separated in 2013 and after speaking to a police officer about a dispute over child arrangements, the woman came to understand she had the right to refuse sex with her husband.
She subsequently told the police that in 2002, her husband pulled grabbed her by the wrists, pulled her to the sofa and had sex with her even though she asked him to stop three times.
The husband denied ever having sexual relations with his wife without her consent and specifically denied the incident that led to the charges.
He testified that the alleged incident could not have taken place, as he had undergone a hair transplant and had been told by his doctor to refrain from sex at that time.
The judge said the man was evasive as a witness and rejected his account as not believable.
“The accused did not call any medical evidence to show this was standard medical practice,” Justice Smith said, “and I find his evidence in this regard does not accord with common sense to a reasonably informed person.”
Despite this, the judge found the man not guilty of a crime.
“Marriage is not a shield for sexual assault. However, the issue in this trial is whether, considering the whole of the evidence, the Crown has proven the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt,” he wrote in his decision.